Correlations among quality parameters of peach fruit

The correlations among quality parameters of peach fruit (Prunus persica L Batsch) were studied for eight different cultivar-shape-site-nitrogen-season combinations (‘treatments’). Between 66 and 183 fruits were taken from each treatment and the quality parameters of skin colour, flesh firmness and taste were measured. Differences and similarities between treatments were analysed using a recent development in biplot multivariate analysis: the ACT method (Analyse Conjointe de Tableaux), which allows the study of several data tables in one unique analysis. Each treatment was characterised by a data table where records were the fruit and variables were quality parameters. A common pattern of correlation between quality parameters was found for all the treatments. Two main independent gradients were described. The first was a colour gradient and the second was a taste gradient. In the latter, the concentrations of sucrose and malic acid varied inversely with citric acid concentration. The firmness and the concentration of reducing sugars were independent of these gradients.

[1]  P. H. Jerie,et al.  Gradients in Maturity and Sugar Levels of Fruit Within Peach Trees , 1988, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[2]  D. Jeffries.  Snowpack Storage of Pollutants, Release during Melting, and Impact on Receiving Waters , 1990 .

[3]  I. Warrington,et al.  Fruit colour responses of 'Granny Smith' apple to variable light environments. , 1990 .

[4]  David Zilberman,et al.  How quality relates to price in California fresh peaches , 1991 .

[5]  J. P. Sweeney,et al.  Sugar, acid, and flavor in fresh fruits. , 1970, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[6]  Allan R. Wilks,et al.  The new S language: a programming environment for data analysis and graphics , 1988 .

[7]  Y. Escoufier.  LE TRAITEMENT DES VARIABLES VECTORIELLES , 1973 .

[8]  W. R. Forbus,et al.  Physical and chemical changes during the maturation of peaches (cv. Majestic). , 1991 .

[9]  C. Bruhn,et al.  CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS OF QUALITY: APRICOTS, CANTALOUPES, PEACHES, PEARS, STRAWBERRIES, AND TOMATOES , 1991 .

[10]  M. Génard,et al.  Variabilité de la croissance et de la qualité chez la pêche (Prunus persica L Batsch) et liaison entre croissance et qualité , 1991 .

[11]  V. Arthey.  Quality of horticultural products. , 1975 .

[12]  P. Duncombe,et al.  Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis: Correspondence Analysis and Related Techniques for Large Matrices , 1985 .

[13]  Claus Weihs,et al.  OMEGA (Online Multivariate Exploratory Graphical Analysis): Routine Searching for Structure , 1990 .

[14]  M. J. Delwiche,et al.  Ground Color Measurements of Peach , 1983, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[15]  R. Marini,et al.  Peach Fruit Quality Is Affected by Shade during Final Swell of Fruit Growth , 1991 .

[16]  D. McHale,et al.  Analyse Conjointe de Tableaux Quantitatifs , 1990 .

[17]  T. Walker,et al.  Indicators of maturity in apricots using biplot multivariate analysis , 1990 .

[18]  W. Gruber,et al.  Determination of citrate with citrate lyase. , 1966, Analytical biochemistry.

[19]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  Graphical Techniques for Multidimensional Data Analysis , 1991 .

[20]  J. Trout,et al.  Sampling procedures for minimizing variation in peach fruit quality , 1984 .

[21]  M. Génard,et al.  Multivariate analysis of within-tree factors accounting for the variation of peach fruit quality , 1992 .