The Emergence of National Electronic Health Record Architectures in the United States and Australia: Models, Costs, and Questions

Emerging electronic health record models present numerous challenges to health care systems, physicians, and regulators. This article provides explanation of some of the reasons driving the development of the electronic health record, describes two national electronic health record models (currently developing in the United States and Australia) and one distributed, personal model. The US and Australian models are contrasted in their different architectures (“pull” versus “push”) and their different approaches to patient autonomy, privacy, and confidentiality. The article also discusses some of the professional, practical, and legal challenges that health care providers potentially face both during and after electronic health record implementation.

[1]  Don E. Detmer,et al.  Commentary: A Progress Report on Computer-Based Patient Records in the United States , 1997 .

[2]  Elizabeth Davies.  A sense of déjà vu , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Computerized Physician Order Entry ( CPOE ) with Clinical Decision Support Systems ( CDSSs ) , 2001 .

[4]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  K. McDonald,et al.  Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. , 2001, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[6]  Charles Safran,et al.  Electronic Medical Records: A Decade of Experience , 2001 .

[7]  Margaret Edmunds,et al.  BOARD ON HEALTH CARE SERVICES INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE , 1998 .

[8]  Stephen H Walsh.  The clinician's perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Kevin B. Johnson,et al.  Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. , 2002, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[10]  Nicolas P. Terry.  WHEN THE "MACHINE THAT GOES 'PING'" CAUSES HARM: DEFAULT TORTS RULES AND TECHNOLOGICALLY-MEDIATED HEALTH CARE INJURIES(*) , 2002 .

[11]  N P Terry,et al.  An eHealth diptych: the impact of privacy regulation on medical error and malpractice litigation. , 2001, American journal of law & medicine.

[12]  I. Kohane,et al.  Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  E. B. Steen,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  J. Rashbass,et al.  msJAMA. The patient-owned, population-based electronic medical record: a revolutionary resource for clinical medicine. , 2001, JAMA.

[15]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Prescribing safety features of general practice computer systems: evaluation using simulated test cases , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  The electronic patient record in primary care—regression or progression? A cross sectional study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  N. Terry.  Privacy and the health information domain: properties, models and unintended results. , 2003, European journal of health law.

[18]  H. Humphrey,et al.  Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. , 2003, Health care law monthly.

[19]  Nicolas P Terry.  Prescriptions sans frontières (or how I stopped worrying about Viagra on the Web but grew concerned about the future of healthcare delivery). , 2004, Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics.

[20]  Lynn A. Karoly,et al.  Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Administrative Simplification , 2010, Practice Management Consultant.

[21]  J H Schneider.  Online personal medical records: Are they reliable for acute/critical care? , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[22]  Justin Starren,et al.  Patient Participation in Electronic Medical Records , 2001 .

[23]  C Safran.  msJAMA. Electronic medical records: a decade of experience. , 2001, JAMA.

[24]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.