Using Base Position Errors in an Entropy-Based Evaluation Function for the Study of Genetic Code Adaptability

The canonical genetic code is almost universal. An intriguing question is why the canonical genetic code is used instead of another genetic code. Some researchers have proposed that the canonical genetic code is a product of natural selection. This hypothesis is supported by its robustness against mutations. In this paper, we propose a new evaluation function based on entropy and robustness against base position errors for the study of genetic code adaptability. In order to find the best hypothetical genetic codes in the search space, we use a genetic algorithm (GA). The experimental results indicate that, when the proposed evaluation function is compared to the standard evaluation function based only on robustness, the difference between the fitness of the best hypothetical codes found by the GA and the fitness of the canonical genetic code is smaller.

[1]  L. Hurst,et al.  The Genetic Code Is One in a Million , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[2]  José Santos,et al.  Study of the genetic code adaptability by means of a genetic algorithm. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  J. Parker,et al.  Errors and alternatives in reading the universal genetic code. , 1989, Microbiological reviews.

[4]  Nick Goldman,et al.  Further results on error minimization in the genetic code , 1993, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[5]  H. Lodish Molecular Cell Biology , 1986 .

[6]  Stephen J. Freeland,et al.  The Darwinian Genetic Code: An Adaptation for Adapting? , 2002, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[7]  José Santos Reyes,et al.  Simulated evolution applied to study the genetic code optimality using a model of codon reassignments , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  M. R. Capobianco,et al.  On the optimization of the physicochemical distances between amino acids in the evolution of the genetic code. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Massimo Di Giulio,et al.  The extension reached by the minimization of the polarity distances during the evolution of the genetic code , 1989, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[10]  F. Crick Origin of the Genetic Code , 1967, Nature.

[11]  L F Landweber,et al.  Selection, history and chemistry: the three faces of the genetic code. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[12]  Renato Tinós,et al.  Entropy-based evaluation function for the investigation of genetic code adaptability , 2012, BCB '12.

[13]  C R Woese,et al.  Evolution of the genetic code , 1973, The Science of Nature.

[14]  Massimo Di Giulio,et al.  The origin of the genetic code: theories and their relationships, a review. , 2005 .

[15]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  A quantitative measure of error minimization in the genetic code , 1991, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[16]  Peter Clote,et al.  How optimal is the genetic code? , 1997, German Conference on Bioinformatics.

[17]  J. Hooper,et al.  On the structure of rhodopsin and its changes after light exposure. , 1968, Currents in modern biology.

[18]  A. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry , 1984 .