The role of actin protrusion dynamics in cell migration through a degradable viscoelastic extracellular matrix: Insights from a computational model

Actin protrusion dynamics plays an important role in the regulation of three-dimensional (3D) cell migration. Cells form protrusions that adhere to the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM), mechanically probe the ECM and contract in order to displace the cell body. This results in cell migration that can be directed by the mechanical anisotropy of the ECM. However, the subcellular processes that regulate protrusion dynamics in 3D cell migration are difficult to investigate experimentally and therefore not well understood. Here, we present a computational model of cell migration through a degradable viscoelastic ECM. The cell is modeled as an active deformable object that captures the viscoelastic behavior of the actin cortex and the subcellular processes underlying 3D cell migration. The ECM is regarded as a viscoelastic material, with or without anisotropy due to fibrillar strain stiffening, and modeled by means of the meshless Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method. ECM degradation is captured by local fluidization of the material and permits cell migration through the ECM. We demonstrate that changes in ECM stiffness and cell strength affect cell migration and are accompanied by changes in number, lifetime and length of protrusions. Interestingly, directly changing the total protrusion number or the average lifetime or length of protrusions does not affect cell migration. A stochastic variability in protrusion lifetime proves to be enough to explain differences in cell migration velocity. Force-dependent adhesion disassembly does not result in faster migration, but can make migration more efficient. We also demonstrate that when a number of simultaneous protrusions is enforced, the optimal number of simultaneous protrusions is one or two, depending on ECM anisotropy. Together, the model provides non-trivial new insights in the role of protrusions in 3D cell migration and can be a valuable contribution to increase the understanding of 3D cell migration mechanics. Author summary The ability of cells to migrate through a tissue in the human body is vital for many processes such as tissue development, growth and regeneration. At the same time, abnormal cell migration is also playing an important role in many diseases such as cancer. If we want to be able to explain the origin of these abnormalities and develop new treatment strategies, we have to understand how cells are able to regulate their migration. Since it is challenging to investigate cell migration through a biological tissue in experiments, computational modeling can provide a valuable contribution. We have developed a computational model of cell migration through a deformable and degradable material that describes both mechanics of the cell and the surrounding material and subcellular processes underlying cell migration. This model captures the formation of long and thin protrusions that adhere to the surrounding material and that pull the cell forward. It provides new non-trivial insights in the role of these protrusions in cell migration and the regulation of protrusion dynamics by cell strength and anisotropic mechanical properties of the surrounding material. Therefore, we believe that this model can be a valuable tool to further improve the understanding of cell migration.

[1]  Benoit Ladoux,et al.  Front-Rear Polarization by Mechanical Cues: From Single Cells to Tissues. , 2016, Trends in cell biology.

[2]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  Actomyosin Cortical Mechanical Properties in Nonadherent Cells Determined by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[4]  Adrian Moure,et al.  Phase-field model of cellular migration: Three-dimensional simulations in fibrous networks , 2017 .

[5]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Myosin-II controls cellular branching morphogenesis and migration in 3D by minimizing cell surface curvature , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.

[6]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Three-dimensional force microscopy of cells in biopolymer networks , 2015, Nature Methods.

[7]  C. Storm,et al.  Normal stresses in elastic networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Dirk Drasdo,et al.  Quantifying the mechanics and growth of cells and tissues in 3D using high resolution computational models , 2018, bioRxiv.

[9]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  Myosin II-Mediated Focal Adhesion Maturation Is Tension Insensitive , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Claudia Tanja Mierke,et al.  Physical view on migration modes , 2015, Cell adhesion & migration.

[11]  James Hone,et al.  Tropomyosin Controls Sarcomere-like Contractions for Rigidity Sensing and Suppressing Growth on Soft Matrices , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  Robert D. Goldman,et al.  Actin, microtubules, and vimentin intermediate filaments cooperate for elongation of invadopodia , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  Albert Jin,et al.  Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[14]  Patrick T. Caswell,et al.  Actin-Based Cell Protrusion in a 3D Matrix , 2018, Trends in cell biology.

[15]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[16]  B. R. Bass,et al.  3D collagen alignment limits protrusions to enhance breast cancer cell persistence. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  A Lagrangian particle method for the simulation of linear and nonlinear elastic models of soft tissue , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  R D Kamm,et al.  Mechano-sensing and cell migration: a 3D model approach , 2011, Physical biology.

[19]  Holger Wendland,et al.  Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree , 1995, Adv. Comput. Math..

[20]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[21]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  Comparison of cell migration mechanical strategies in three-dimensional matrices: a computational study , 2016, Interface Focus.

[22]  P. Mattila,et al.  Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  Bart Smeets,et al.  Analysis of Initial Cell Spreading Using Mechanistic Contact Formulations for a Deformable Cell Model , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Bart Smeets,et al.  Modeling extracellular matrix viscoelasticity using smoothed particle hydrodynamics with improved boundary treatment , 2017 .

[25]  Robert M. Hoffman,et al.  Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  John Kolega,et al.  Endothelial cell protrusion and migration in three-dimensional collagen matrices. , 2006, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[27]  Ed Munro,et al.  Determinants of fluidlike behavior and effective viscosity in cross-linked actin networks. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Computational modeling of three-dimensional ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  Three-dimensional matrix fiber alignment modulates cell migration and MT1-MMP utility by spatially and temporally directing protrusions , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[30]  J. Folgado,et al.  Computational model of mesenchymal migration in 3D under chemotaxis , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[31]  Adrian Moure,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of obstacle-mediated chemotaxis , 2018, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[32]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Three-dimensional cell migration does not follow a random walk , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  M. Stack,et al.  Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[34]  B. Ladoux,et al.  Physically based principles of cell adhesion mechanosensitivity in tissues , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[35]  Cynthia A Reinhart-King,et al.  Tuning three-dimensional collagen matrix stiffness independently of collagen concentration modulates endothelial cell behavior. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[36]  Adrian Moure,et al.  Computational model for amoeboid motion: Coupling membrane and cytosol dynamics. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[37]  Erez Raz,et al.  The role and regulation of blebs in cell migration , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[38]  Bart Smeets,et al.  Solving microscopic flow problems using Stokes equations in SPH , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[39]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[41]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Ruben Martinez-Cantin,et al.  Integration of in vitro and in silico Models Using Bayesian Optimization With an Application to Stochastic Modeling of Mesenchymal 3D Cell Migration , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[43]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[44]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  Local extracellular matrix alignment directs cellular protrusion dynamics and migration through Rac1 and FAK. , 2016, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[45]  Jason M Haugh,et al.  Directed migration of mesenchymal cells: where signaling and the cytoskeleton meet. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[46]  Robert S. Adelstein,et al.  Local Cortical Tension by Myosin II Guides 3D Endothelial Cell Branching , 2009, Current Biology.

[47]  S. Rizzi,et al.  Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[48]  B. Fabry,et al.  Biphasic response of cell invasion to matrix stiffness in three-dimensional biopolymer networks. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.