Perception of a New Design of Toothbrush by Its Users

Background: The correct position of bristles of a toothbrush requires them to be bent at an angle of 45 along with gums and teeth surfaces. This practice is quite difficult by many people especially dis- advantage group of people. Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of users on a newly designed toothbrush with two brushing surfaces where bristles were prefabricated at an angle of 45 o . Methodology: The innovative toothbrush was provided to 500 voluntarily study participants in Malaysia, Pakistan, Egypt, Japan and Germany. The subjects cleaned their teeth for two weeks without oral hygiene instructions. The participants submitted their responses based on closed end questionnaire via hard and soft copy. Data was analyzed. Results: There was a 57 percent (n= 285) response rate. The highest response was from Malaysian subjects (n=140, percent 49.12). Due to small number of data from Pakistan, Egypt, Japan and Germany, respondents were combined as International subjects (n=145, percent 50.88). Gender based response was Male (n= 128, percent 44.9) and female (n= 122, percent 42.8) and respondents (n=35, percent 12.3) left the column of gender blank. More than 30 % of the subjects were attracted by its blended colorful bristles. More than 50 % found the new shaped tooth-brush to be satisfactory. Conclusion: The innovative toothbrush is friendly in cleaning teeth without knowing recommended brushing technique.

[1]  Joanna Asadoorian,et al.  CDHA Position Paper on Tooth Brushing , 2006 .

[2]  H Löe,et al.  Periodontal diseases in the United States population. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  C. Graetz,et al.  Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system. , 2013, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  L. Tedesco,et al.  Behavioral research related to oral hygiene practices: a new century model of oral health promotion. , 1995, Periodontology 2000.

[5]  R G Newcombe,et al.  Comparison of video and written instructions for plaque removal by an oscillating/rotating/reciprocating electric toothbrush. , 1999, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[6]  N. Steen,et al.  Assessing adherence with toothbrushing instructions using a data logger toothbrush , 2005, British Dental Journal.

[7]  S L Yankell,et al.  New studies on estimated and actual toothbrushing times and dentifrice use. , 1998, The Journal of clinical dentistry.

[8]  Teresa Kokot,et al.  Assessment of oral hygiene in adults. , 2012, Central European journal of public health.

[9]  R M Davies,et al.  Prevention. Part 4: Toothbrushing: What advice should be given to patients? , 2003, British Dental Journal.

[10]  Lea Maes,et al.  Tooth brushing and social characteristics of families in 32 countries. , 2006, International dental journal.

[11]  C Ganss,et al.  Tooth brushing habits in uninstructed adults—frequency, technique, duration and force , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[12]  T Arai,et al.  A comparison of plaque removal by different toothbrushes and toothbrushing methods. , 1977, The Bulletin of Tokyo Medical and Dental University.

[13]  N Segerlund,et al.  Role of brushing technique and toothbrush design in plaque removal. , 1984, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[14]  Karen B Williams,et al.  The effect of an oral health promotion program for people with psychiatric disabilities. , 2006, Psychiatric rehabilitation journal.

[15]  M. Poyato-Ferrera,et al.  Comparison of modified Bass technique with normal toothbrushing practices for efficacy in supragingival plaque removal. , 2003, International journal of dental hygiene.

[16]  Paul R Warren,et al.  The Oral-B CrossAction manual toothbrush: a 5-year literature review. , 2006, Journal.

[17]  E. Burdmann,et al.  Comparison of Azithromycin and Oral Hygiene Program in the Treatment of Cyclosporine-Induced Gingival Hyperplasia , 2007, Renal failure.

[18]  I. Macgregor,et al.  Flossing behaviour in English adolescents. , 1998, Journal of clinical periodontology.