Comparative Study on New lighting Technologies and Buildings Plans for High-performance Architecture

Daylighting has always been the central focus of designers. Today, due to economic, health, and environmental concerns, daylighting has taken on paramount importance. However, due to location and architectural restrictions, the use of natural light in all interior spaces is a challenge facing architects. Today, although the development of modern lighting systems has contributed to a solution to this problem, the provision of necessary conditions for more efficient daylighting necessitates a thorough understanding of all types of lighting systems and plans. This study aimed to further link technology and architecture to take the required steps to solve the shortage of interior daylight by comparing and selecting appropriate daylighting systems and plans. To this end, we first studied various modern lighting systems and analyzed their characteristics to prioritize and select their most efficient elements and factors. In this regard, the FGD method was used to identify criteria and sub-criteria. Then ANP was used to analyze and compared to identify the most optimal ones. In the next step, we studied different types of office plans to prioritize them based on the aforementioned elements. It is worth noting that to validate the results, we surveyed experts in the field. In the last step, we studied compared the compatibility of different plans and systems to achieve the most compatible ones.

[1]  Mohsen Faizi,et al.  Integration Issues for Using Innovative Daylighting Strategies in Light Wells , 2017 .

[2]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[3]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies , 2009 .

[4]  Maurizio Brocato,et al.  Building Integrated Photovoltaic System for a Solar Infrastructure: Liv-lib’ Project , 2016 .

[5]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Overview and new developments in optical daylighting systems for building a healthy indoor environment , 2010 .

[7]  Zaid Chalabi,et al.  Impact of climate change on the domestic indoor environment and associated health risks in the UK. , 2015, Environment international.

[8]  M. Aries.  Human lighting demands : healthy lighting in an office environment , 2005 .

[9]  K. Wilson,et al.  The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation , 2018 .

[10]  M. Fontoynont,et al.  Day-lighting of underground spaces: design rules , 1996 .

[11]  P. Pellikka,et al.  Local assessment of changes in water-related ecosystem services and their management: DPASER conceptual model and its application in Taita Hills, Kenya , 2015 .

[12]  Ahmed S. Muhaisen,et al.  Effect of Building Proportions on the Thermal Performance in the Mediterranean Climate of the Gaza Strip , 2016 .

[13]  D. S. Ward.  Operating Thresholds of Solar Collection Systems , 1980 .

[14]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[15]  M. Osman,et al.  Analyses of Daylighting Effects on Human Health in Buildings , 2017 .

[16]  Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan,et al.  Comprehensive Review on India’s Growth in Renewable Energy Technologies in Comparison With Other Prominent Renewable Energy Based Countries , 2020 .

[17]  Veronica Garcia-Hansen,et al.  Innovative daylighting systems for deep-plan commercial buildings , 2006 .

[18]  Frank Kreith.  Technical Editor’s Page: Solar Energy for Developing Countries , 1980 .

[19]  Francis Duffy.  Planning Office Space , 2010 .

[20]  E. Crinó,et al.  Solar and Climatic High Performance Factors for the Placement of Solar Power Plants in Argentina Andes Sites—Comparison With African and Asian Sites , 2019, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering.

[21]  A. James.  2010 , 2011, Philo of Alexandria: an Annotated Bibliography 2007-2016.

[22]  H. Kaase,et al.  Lightpipe applications for daylighting systems , 2005 .

[23]  D. J. Carter,et al.  Remote source electric lighting systems: A review , 1995 .

[24]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[25]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Interface: The Use and Misuse of Focus Groups , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[26]  Anca D. Galasiu,et al.  Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review , 2006 .

[27]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  Introducing natural lighting into the enclosed lift lobbies of highrise buildings by remote source lighting system , 2012 .

[29]  Sergio Altomonte,et al.  Daylight for Energy Savings and Psycho-Physiological Well-Being in Sustainable Built Environments , 2009 .

[30]  Li Liu,et al.  Effect of geometric factors on the energy performance of high-rise office towers in Tianjin, China , 2017 .

[31]  Mohammadjavad Mahdavinejad,et al.  Horizontal Distribution of Illuminance with Reference to Window Wall Ratio (WWR) in Office Buildings in Hot and Dry Climate, Case of Iran, Tehran , 2011 .

[32]  M. Jahangiri,et al.  Optimal Design and Parametric Assessment of Grid-Connected Solar Power Plants in Iran, a Review , 2019 .

[33]  P. Liamputtong.  Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practice , 2011 .

[34]  J. Petržala,et al.  Analytical Prediction of Tubular Light-Pipe Performance Under Arbitrary Sky Conditions , 2019, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering.

[35]  Aleš Krainer,et al.  LIGHT WELLS IN RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AS A COMPLEMENTARY DAYLIGHT SOURCE , 1999 .

[36]  Tara L. Teel,et al.  Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation , 2018 .

[37]  M. S. Mayhoub,et al.  Innovative daylighting systems’ challenges: A critical study , 2014 .

[38]  E. M. Alawadhi.  Comparative Performance of a Solar Screen With Respect to Perforation Ratio: Illuminance and Energy Saving , 2018, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering.

[39]  Lingling Zhang,et al.  Shape optimization of free-form buildings based on solar radiation gain and space efficiency using a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the severe cold zones of China , 2016 .

[40]  Roland Winston,et al.  The thermodynamic limits of light concentrators , 1990 .

[41]  E. Tronci,et al.  1996 , 1997, Affair of the Heart.

[42]  K. van der Velden,et al.  Building integrated health systems in central and eastern Europe: an analysis of WHO and World Bank views and their relevance to health systems in transition. , 2003, European journal of public health.

[43]  Allen Jong-Woei Whang,et al.  Distribution of Emerged Energy for Daylight Illuminate on Prismatic Elements , 2011 .

[44]  Haris Ch. Doukas,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aid for the formulation of sustainable technological energy priorities using linguistic variables , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Jozef Hraska.  Chronobiological aspects of green buildings daylighting , 2015 .

[46]  Jonathan Q. Tritter,et al.  Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate , 2006 .

[47]  Inger Andresen,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Solar Building Design , 2000 .

[48]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Impact of building shape on thermal performance of office buildings in Kuwait , 2009 .

[49]  Rosaline S. Barbour,et al.  Introduction: The Challenge and Promise of Focus Groups , 1999 .

[50]  A. Ebrahimi-Moghadam,et al.  The effect of internal light shelf on quality of daylight distribution in space and lighting energy consumption reduction , 2019 .

[51]  Mohammadjavad Mahdavinejad,et al.  Daylightophil Approach towards High-Performance Architecture for Hybrid-Optimization of Visual Comfort and Daylight Factor in BSk , 2017 .

[52]  M. Kazemi.  Analysing efficiency of vertical transfer light pipe in medium depth building , 2019 .

[54]  V. Stevanovic,et al.  Sustainable development of the Belgrade energy system , 2009 .

[55]  Janet Smithson,et al.  Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities , 2000 .

[56]  René Altherr.  A low environmental impact anidolic facade , 2001 .

[57]  A. Freewan.  IMPACT OF EXTERNAL SHADING DEVICES ON THERMAL AND DAYLIGHTING PERFORMANCE OF OFFICES IN HOT CLIMATE REGIONS , 2014 .

[58]  T. A. Wright,et al.  Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[59]  Matthias Haase,et al.  A zero emission concept analysis of a single family house , 2014 .

[60]  Chen Wang,et al.  Daylighting can be fluorescent: Development of a fiber solar concentrator and test for its indoor illumination , 2010 .

[61]  Mohsen Faizi,et al.  REVIEW OF THE INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE DAYLIGHT PENETRATION IN BUILDING , 2016 .

[62]  B. Paule,et al.  Anidolic zenithal openings: Daylighting and shading , 1996 .

[63]  Ubiratan Holanda Bezerra,et al.  Methodology for Preliminary Design of Buildings Using Multi-Objective Optimization Based on Performance Simulation. , 2019, Journal of solar energy engineering.