Informational Boundary Work in Everyday Life

Everyday life often requires a great deal of work to manage the multiple domains that comprise it (e.g., paid work, family care, household maintenance, body and health management, leisure, education, social life, and community or religious involvement). This “boundary work” includes the ongoing categorization of life domains, the establishment and negotiation of boundary permeability, and the crossing of boundaries. The boundaries between the domains of everyday life are negotiated differently by different people and by the same person over time as life circumstances change. Information Science research tends to dichotomize “everyday life” and workplace information practices. Scholars seeking to understand the character of everyday life information practices must attend to the informational work required to (a) place, maintain, and challenge boundaries among life domains, and (b) orchestrate the bridging or crossing of those boundaries. This paper uses the example of keeping track of municipal waste collection to explore the informational work of managing, maintaining, and crossing boundaries in everyday life. Some participants recorded “garbage day” in centrally-located personal information management (PIM) tools shared with household members. By doing so, they integrated the task of waste disposal into an everyday life with other household members that included multiple domains, including paid work. Others’ approaches categorized waste collection as separate from the inside life of the household. The study provides evidence that participants engaged in boundary work within their non-work lives, beyond simply establishing boundaries between work and home.

[1]  Melissa G. Ocepek Bringing out the everyday in everyday information behavior , 2017, J. Documentation.

[2]  William Jones,et al.  Keeping Found Things Found: The Study and Practice of Personal Information Management: The Study and Practice of Personal Information Management , 2007 .

[3]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Time, Ownership and Awareness: The Value of Contextual Locations in the Home , 2005, UbiComp.

[4]  Jutta Haider,et al.  The environment on holidays or how a recycling bin informs us on the environment , 2011, J. Documentation.

[5]  Glen E. Kreiner,et al.  BALANCING BORDERS AND BRIDGES: NEGOTIATING THE WORK-HOME INTERFACE VIA BOUNDARY WORK TACTICS , 2009 .

[6]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[7]  Reijo Savolainen Information Behavior and Information Practice: Reviewing the “Umbrella Concepts” of Information‐Seeking Studies1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[8]  S. Clark Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance , 2000 .

[9]  Leslie Thomson,et al.  "When i've packed it in and they send me something ...": Information boundaries in professional home offices , 2013, ASIST.

[10]  Christena Nippert-Eng,et al.  Calendars and keys: The classification of “home” and “work” , 1996 .

[11]  Pamela J. McKenzie,et al.  Genre systems and “keeping track” in everyday life , 2012 .

[12]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  All in a Day'S Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions , 2000 .

[13]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Information Work at the Boundaries of Science: Linking Library Services to Research Practices , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[14]  Reijo Savolainen Everyday Information Practices: A Social Phenomenological Perspective , 2008 .

[15]  J. Richardson,et al.  All of work? All of life? Reconceptualising work‐life balance for the 21st century , 2018, Human Resource Management Journal.

[16]  Adam Worrall,et al.  Boundary objects in information science , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[18]  Lilian Otaye‐Ebede,et al.  Half a Century of Work–Nonwork Interface Research: A Review and Taxonomy of Terminologies , 2018, Applied Psychology.

[19]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .