Promoting the use of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality: results from the ESOR Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis teaching fellowship

[1]  F. Giganti,et al.  Promoting the use of the PRECISE score for prostate MRI during active surveillance: results from the ESOR Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis teaching fellowship , 2022, Insights into Imaging.

[2]  C. Zuiani,et al.  Inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score: A bicentric study. , 2022, European journal of radiology.

[3]  T. Barrett,et al.  Prostate MRI quality: clinical impact of the PI-QUAL score in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up. , 2022, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  B. Turkbey.  Better Image Quality for Diffusion-weighted MRI of the Prostate Using Deep Learning. , 2022, Radiology.

[5]  T. Helbich,et al.  Rectal preparation significantly improves prostate imaging quality: Assessment of the PI-QUAL score with visual grading characteristics. , 2022, European journal of radiology.

[6]  J. Barentsz,et al.  PI-QUAL v.1: the first step towards good-quality prostate MRI , 2021, European Radiology.

[7]  P. Albers,et al.  Comparison and prediction of artefact severity due to total hip replacement in 1.5 T versus 3 T MRI of the prostate. , 2021, European journal of radiology.

[8]  A. Freeman,et al.  Inter-reader agreement of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality in the NeuroSAFE PROOF trial , 2021, European Radiology.

[9]  S. Punwani,et al.  Understanding PI-QUAL for prostate MRI quality: a practical primer for radiologists , 2021, Insights into Imaging.

[10]  A. Padhani,et al.  A multifaceted approach to quality in the MRI-directed biopsy pathway for prostate cancer diagnosis , 2020, European Radiology.

[11]  A. Padhani,et al.  Measuring the Quality of Diagnostic Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Urologist's Perspective. , 2020, European urology.

[12]  P. Choyke,et al.  PI-QUAL, a New System for Evaluating Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality: Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder? , 2020, European urology oncology.

[13]  F. Giganti,et al.  Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): A New Quality Control Scoring System for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate from the PRECISION trial. , 2020, European urology oncology.

[14]  A. Padhani,et al.  ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists’ training , 2020, European Radiology.

[15]  K. Hess,et al.  Variation in Technical Quality of Breast MRI. , 2020, Academic radiology.

[16]  S. Wolff,et al.  MRI in patients with implanted active devices: how to combine safety and image quality using a limited transmission field? , 2020, European Radiology.

[17]  D. Margolis,et al.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. , 2019, European urology.

[18]  R. Persad,et al.  A multicentre assessment of prostate MRI quality and compliance with UK and international standards. , 2019, Clinical radiology.

[19]  P. Choyke,et al.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for MRI of Prostate Cancer: Can We Do Better? , 2019, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  S. Punwani,et al.  A Dedicated Prostate MRI Teaching Course Improves the Ability of the Urologist to Interpret Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI. , 2019, European urology.

[21]  Tristan Barrett,et al.  National implementation of multi‐parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection – recommendations from a UK consensus meeting , 2018, BJU international.

[22]  G. Pennello,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models for multi-reader multi-case studies of diagnostic tests , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[23]  A. Rosenkrantz,et al.  The Learning Curve in Prostate MRI Interpretation: Self-Directed Learning Versus Continual Reader Feedback. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  O. Sipilä,et al.  Cardiac MRI in patients with cardiac pacemakers: practical methods for reducing susceptibility artifacts and optimizing image quality , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[25]  H. Hricak,et al.  Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer , 2010, European Radiology.

[26]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[27]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases. , 1992, Radiology.

[28]  Frcr,et al.  ‘ National Implementation of multi-parametric MRI for prostate cancer detection – Recommendations from a UK consensus meeting ’ , 2018 .

[29]  D. Margolis,et al.  PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. , 2016, European urology.