Packaging Patients and Handing Them Over: Communication Context and Persuasion in the Emergency Department

Study objective Communication is commonly understood by health professional researchers to consist of relatively isolated exchanges of information. The social and organizational context is given limited credit. This article examines the significance of the environmental complexity of the emergency department (ED) in influencing communication strategies and makes the case for adopting a richer understanding of organizational communication. Methods This study draws on approximately 12 months (1,600 hours) of ethnographic observations, yielding approximately 4,500 interactions across 260 clinicians and staff in the EDs of 2 metropolitan public teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia. Results The study identifies 5 communication competencies of increasing complexity that emergency clinicians need to accomplish. Furthermore, it identifies several factors—hierarchy, formally imposed organizational boundaries and roles, power, and education—that contribute to the collective function of ensuring smooth patient transfer through and out of the ED. These factors are expressed by and shape external communication with clinicians from other hospital departments. Conclusion This study shows that handoff of patients from the ED to other hospital departments is a complex communication process that involves more than a series of “checklistable” information exchanges. Clinicians must learn to use both negotiation and persuasion to achieve objectives.

[1]  Robert Dunn Reduced access block causes shorter emergency department waiting times: An historical control observational study. , 2003, Emergency medicine.

[2]  C. Wagner,et al.  The implementation of quality management systems in hospitals: a comparison between three countries , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[3]  Brian Hilligoss,et al.  Selling patients and other metaphors: a discourse analysis of the interpretive frames that shape emergency department admission handoffs. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[4]  David L Schriger,et al.  Suggestions for improving the reporting of clinical research: the role of narrative. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  M. Alvesson Understanding organizational culture , 2002 .

[6]  R. Forero,et al.  Understanding interdepartmental and organizational work in the emergency department: an ethnographic approach. , 2011, International emergency nursing.

[7]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Integrated care in the emergency department: a complex adaptive systems perspective. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[8]  Alan Bleakley,et al.  Pre‐registration house officers and ward‐based learning: a `new apprenticeship' model , 2002, Medical education.

[9]  D. Fatovich Effect of ambulance diversion on patient mortality: how access block can save your life , 2005, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  Brian Hilligoss,et al.  A handoff is not a telegram: an understanding of the patient is co-constructed , 2012, Critical Care.

[11]  Theodore R. Schatzki,et al.  On Organizations as they Happen , 2006 .

[12]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[13]  Patrick Charaudeau,et al.  A communicative conception of discourse , 2002 .

[14]  Lee Ann Riesenberg,et al.  Systematic Review of Handoff Mnemonics Literature * , 2019, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[15]  S. Fagerhaugh,et al.  Participant Observation , 1979 .

[16]  Richard L Street,et al.  Exploring emergency physician-hospitalist handoff interactions: development of the Handoff Communication Assessment. , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  R. Wears Work, visible and invisible. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.

[18]  J. Braithwaite An Empirical Assessment of Social Structural and Cultural Change in Clinical Directorates , 2006, Health Care Analysis.

[19]  Brian Hilligoss,et al.  The unappreciated challenges of between-unit handoffs: negotiating and coordinating across boundaries. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[20]  A. Camus,et al.  Openness and Specialisation: Dealing with Patients in a Hospital Emergency Service , 1998 .

[21]  E. Patterson,et al.  Collaborating-or "Selling" Patients? A Conceptual Framework for Emergency Department-to-Inpatient Handoff Negotiations. , 2015, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[22]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Coordination of Care in Emergency Departments: A Comparative International Ethnography , 2013 .

[23]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[24]  J. Bligh,et al.  Distributing menus to hungry learners: can learning by simulation become simulation of learning? , 2006, Medical teacher.

[25]  D. Richardson,et al.  Reducing patient time in the emergency department , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[26]  Mindy E. Flanagan,et al.  “Anybody on this list that you're more worried about?” Qualitative analysis exploring the functions of questions during end of shift handoffs , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[27]  C. Clec’h,et al.  Efficacy of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a propensity analysis , 2012, Critical Care.

[28]  D. Hewett,et al.  Intergroup communication between hospital doctors: implications for quality of patient care. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[29]  C. Vassy,et al.  Categorisation and micro‐rationing: access to care in a French emergency department , 2001 .

[30]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[31]  Renate E. Meyer Review Essay , 2006 .

[32]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  The dynamic interaction of quality and efficiency in the emergency department: Squaring the circle? , 2010, Social science & medicine.