This paper presents a systematic framework and practical guidelines for the implementation of a "zero-based" curriculum review (ZBCR). ZBCR begins with a tabula rasa and the commitment that program faculty and an external advisory board will create a framework of competencies, knowledge bases, professional practices and skills which graduates should have. ZBCR is intended to help us move from an "acciden- tal" curriculum to an "intentional" curriculum. Specific examples illustrate the structur- ing, conducting, and application of the results of the review. ZBCR maximizes the benefits of a fresh perspective and minimizes time and effort, with a situationally- flexible and reusable structure and process. ZBCR is based on procedures recently developed and used with success in reviewing the curricula of a department's programs at a major state university.
[1]
Robert J. Barak.
Program Review in Higher Education: Within and Without. AN NCHEMS Executive Overview.
,
1982
.
[2]
H. Gauthier,et al.
Successful Program Review
,
1992
.
[3]
Clifton F. Conrad,et al.
Academic Program Reviews: Institutional Approaches, Expectations, and Controversies. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5, 1985.
,
1985
.
[4]
Joan S. Stark,et al.
Responsive Professional Education: Balancing Outcomes and Opportunities
,
1986
.
[5]
Larry H. Litten,et al.
On Being Heard in a Noisy World: Matching Messages and Media in College Marketing.
,
1982
.
[6]
George D. Kuh,et al.
A Typology of Planning Problems.
,
1984
.