Local perturbation analysis: a computational tool for biophysical reaction-diffusion models.

Diffusion and interaction of molecular regulators in cells is often modeled using reaction-diffusion partial differential equations. Analysis of such models and exploration of their parameter space is challenging, particularly for systems of high dimensionality. Here, we present a relatively simple and straightforward analysis, the local perturbation analysis, that reveals how parameter variations affect model behavior. This computational tool, which greatly aids exploration of the behavior of a model, exploits a structural feature common to many cellular regulatory systems: regulators are typically either bound to a membrane or freely diffusing in the interior of the cell. Using well-documented, readily available bifurcation software, the local perturbation analysis tracks the approximate early evolution of an arbitrarily large perturbation of a homogeneous steady state. In doing so, it provides a bifurcation diagram that concisely describes various regimes of the model's behavior, reducing the need for exhaustive simulations to explore parameter space. We explain the method and provide detailed step-by-step guides to its use and application.

[1]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Supporting Material : Modeling of protrusion phenotypes driven by the actin-membrane interaction , 2009 .

[2]  Anita T. Layton,et al.  Modeling Vesicle Traffic Reveals Unexpected Consequences for Cdc42p-Mediated Polarity Establishment , 2011, Current Biology.

[3]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[4]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[5]  Andrew B Goryachev,et al.  Dynamics of Cdc42 network embodies a Turing‐type mechanism of yeast cell polarity , 2008, FEBS letters.

[6]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[7]  William R Holmes,et al.  An Efficient, Nonlinear Stability Analysis for Detecting Pattern Formation in Reaction Diffusion Systems , 2012, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[8]  L. Loew,et al.  The Virtual Cell: a software environment for computational cell biology. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  G. Danuser,et al.  Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Brian D. Slaughter,et al.  Weakly nonlinear analysis of symmetry breaking in cell polarity models , 2012, Physical Biology.

[12]  Shuji Ishihara,et al.  A Mass Conserved Reaction–Diffusion System Captures Properties of Cell Polarity , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  L Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Regimes of wave type patterning driven by refractory actin feedback: transition from static polarization to dynamic wave behaviour , 2012, Physical biology.

[14]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Modelling Cell Polarization Driven by Synthetic Spatially Graded Rac Activation , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Michael J. Ward,et al.  A Metastable Spike Solution for a Nonlocal Reaction-Diffusion Model , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[16]  Abbas Shirinifard,et al.  Multi-scale modeling of tissues using CompuCell3D. , 2012, Methods in cell biology.

[17]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Polarization and Movement of Keratocytes: A Multiscale Modelling Approach , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[18]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Mathematical Model for Spatial Segregation of the Rho-Family GTPases Based on Inhibitory Crosstalk , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[19]  Michael Hucka,et al.  SBMLToolbox: an SBML toolbox for MATLAB users , 2006, Bioinform..

[20]  P. Maini,et al.  Spatial pattern formation in chemical and biological systems , 1997 .

[21]  Daniel J. Lew,et al.  Inhibitory GEF Phosphorylation Provides Negative Feedback in the Yeast Polarity Circuit , 2014, Current Biology.

[22]  Catherine M Lloyd,et al.  CellML: its future, present and past. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[23]  Z. Yang,et al.  Rop GTPase: a master switch of cell polarity development in plants. , 2001, Trends in plant science.

[24]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Phosphoinositides and Rho proteins spatially regulate actin polymerization to initiate and maintain directed movement in a one-dimensional model of a motile cell. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[25]  A. Hyman,et al.  Polarization of PAR Proteins by Advective Triggering of a Pattern-Forming System , 2011, Science.

[26]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Designing Synthetic Regulatory Networks Capable of Self-Organizing Cell Polarization , 2012, Cell.

[27]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Asymptotic and Bifurcation Analysis of Wave-Pinning in a Reaction-Diffusion Model for Cell Polarization , 2010, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[28]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  A model for intracellular actin waves explored by nonlinear local perturbation analysis. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  Mobile actin clusters and traveling waves in cells recovering from actin depolymerization. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Synthetic spatially graded Rac activation drives cell polarization and movement , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Dynamic structures in Escherichia coli: Spontaneous formation of MinE rings and MinD polar zones , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  V. Grieneisen,et al.  Dynamics of auxin patterning in plant morphogenesis - A multilevel model study , 2009 .

[33]  Willy Govaerts,et al.  MATCONT: A MATLAB package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs , 2003, TOMS.

[34]  Anita T. Layton,et al.  Mechanistic mathematical model of polarity in yeast , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[35]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  The three-dimensional dynamics of actin waves, a model of cytoskeletal self-organization. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Alexander G. Fletcher,et al.  Chaste: An Open Source C++ Library for Computational Physiology and Biology , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  D. Vavylonis,et al.  Excitable actin dynamics in lamellipodial protrusion and retraction. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  How Cells Integrate Complex Stimuli: The Effect of Feedback from Phosphoinositides and Cell Shape on Cell Polarization and Motility , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  P. Iglesias,et al.  Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  A Comparison of Mathematical Models for Polarization of Single Eukaryotic Cells in Response to Guided Cues , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  W. Rappel,et al.  Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.