Imaging of Arthroplasties: Improved Image Quality and Lesion Detection With Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction, a New CT Metal Artifact Reduction Technique.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR), a new single-energy metal artifact reduction technique, with filtered back projection (FBP) in terms of attenuation values, qualitative image quality, and streak artifacts near shoulder and hip arthroplasties and observer ability with these techniques to detect pathologic lesions near an arthroplasty in a phantom model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preoperative and postoperative CT scans of 40 shoulder and 21 hip arthroplasties were reviewed. All postoperative scans were obtained using the same technique (140 kVp, 300 quality reference mAs, 128 × 0.6 mm detector collimation) on one of three CT scanners and reconstructed with FBP and iMAR. The attenuation differences in bones and soft tissues between preoperative and postoperative scans at the same location were compared; image quality and streak artifact for both reconstructions were qualitatively graded by two blinded readers. Observer ability and confidence to detect lesions near an arthroplasty in a phantom model were graded. RESULTS For both readers, iMAR had more accurate attenuation values (p < 0.001), qualitatively better image quality (p < 0.001), and less streak artifact (p < 0.001) in all locations near arthroplasties compared with FBP. Both readers detected more lesions (p ≤ 0.04) with higher confidence (p ≤ 0.01) with iMAR than with FBP in the phantom model. CONCLUSION The iMAR technique provided more accurate attenuation values, better image quality, and less streak artifact near hip and shoulder arthroplasties than FBP; iMAR also increased observer ability and confidence to detect pathologic lesions near arthroplasties in a phantom model.

[1]  R. Raupach,et al.  Comparison and Combination of Dual-Energy- and Iterative-Based Metal Artefact Reduction on Hip Prosthesis and Dental Implants , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  J G Fletcher,et al.  CT Metal Artifact Reduction in the Spine: Can an Iterative Reconstruction Technique Improve Visualization? , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[3]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  Francesco C Stingo,et al.  An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Metal artefact reduction from dental hardware in carotid CT angiography using iterative reconstructions , 2013, European Radiology.

[6]  A. Blum,et al.  Total hip prosthesis CT with single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction: impact on the visualization of specific periprosthetic soft tissue structures , 2014, Skeletal Radiology.

[7]  Nancy A. Obuchowski,et al.  Iterative metal artifact reduction: Evaluation and optimization of technique , 2014, Skeletal Radiology.

[8]  Sebastian Bickelhaupt,et al.  Reduction of metal artifacts from hip prostheses on CT images of the pelvis: value of iterative reconstructions. , 2013, Radiology.

[9]  Chen Lin,et al.  Managing Postoperative Artifacts on Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[10]  P. Thunberg,et al.  Metal artefact reduction in CT imaging of hip prostheses—an evaluation of commercial techniques provided by four vendors. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  Val M Runge,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography. , 2012, Medical physics.

[13]  M. Nittka,et al.  Metal artifact reduction: standard and advanced magnetic resonance and computed tomography techniques. , 2015, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[14]  Kenneth A Buckwalter,et al.  Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. , 2002, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[15]  Huadan Xue,et al.  Reduction of Metal Artifacts From Alloy Hip Prostheses in Computer Tomography , 2014, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  CT metal artefact reduction for internal fixation of the proximal humerus: value of mono-energetic extrapolation from dual-energy and iterative reconstructions. , 2014, Clinical radiology.

[17]  Joon Koo Han,et al.  Usefulness of a metal artifact reduction algorithm for orthopedic implants in abdominal CT: phantom and clinical study results. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.