Why do teachers vary in their instructional change during science PD? The role of noticing students in an iterative change process
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Christine L. Bae,et al. Why does teacher learning vary in professional development? Accounting for organisational conditions , 2023, Professional Development in Education.
[2] Paulo Blikstein,et al. Beyond “Having Fun” As Evidence of Learning: A Longitudinal Case Study of a Teacher’s Evolving Conception of Hands-On Science Activities , 2023, Journal of Science Education and Technology.
[3] Tatiane Russo‐Tait. Science Faculty Conceptions of Equity and Their Association to Teaching Practices , 2022, Science Education.
[4] Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al. Engagement in high‐leverage science teaching practices among novice elementary teachers , 2022, Science Education.
[5] V. Sampson,et al. How the co-design, use, and refinement of an instructional model emphasizing argumentation relates to changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices , 2022, International Journal of Science Education.
[6] Remy Dou,et al. Equity and justice in science education: Toward a pluriverse of multiple identities and onto‐epistemologies , 2022, Science Education.
[7] Christine L. Bae,et al. A Systematic Review of Science Discourse in K–12 Urban Classrooms in the United States: Accounting for Individual, Collective, and Contextual Factors , 2021, Review of Educational Research.
[8] Zachary K. Collier,et al. Determinants of Black families’ access to a community‐based STEM program: A latent class analysis , 2021, Science Education.
[9] Melissa J. Luna,et al. Examining the Responding Component of Teacher Noticing: A Case of One Teacher’s Pedagogical Responses to Students’ Thinking in Classroom Artifacts , 2021, Journal of Teacher Education.
[10] Daniella Molle. A close look at teacher learning: Why are teachers’ journeys so different? , 2021 .
[11] Elizabeth A. van Es,et al. Expanding on prior conceptualizations of teacher noticing , 2021, ZDM – Mathematics Education.
[12] Pam Hanley,et al. Thinking, doing, talking science: the effect on attainment and attitudes of a professional development programme to provide cognitively challenging primary science lessons , 2020 .
[13] Enrique Suárez. “Estoy Explorando Science”: Emergent bilingual students problematizing electrical phenomena through translanguaging , 2020, Science Education.
[14] Christine L. Bae,et al. Beyond Funding: How Organizational Resources Support Science Professional Learning , 2020, American Journal of Education.
[15] Jennifer L. Maeng,et al. The effect of professional development on elementary science teachers’ understanding, confidence, and classroom implementation of reform‐based science instruction , 2020, Science Education.
[16] Sara C. Heredia. Exploring the role of coherence in science teachers’ sensemaking of science‐specific formative assessment in professional development , 2020 .
[17] Steven Z. Athanases,et al. Noticing for Equity to Sustain Multilingual Literacies , 2019, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy.
[18] Ying‐Chih Chen,et al. Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation , 2019, Science Education.
[19] Daniel Morales‐Doyle. There is no equity in a vacuum: on the importance of historical, political, and moral considerations in science education , 2019, Cultural Studies of Science Education.
[20] C. Schunn,et al. Change in Thinking Demands for Students Across the Phases of a Science Task: An Exploratory Study , 2019 .
[21] Bryan J. Matlen,et al. Coping with constraints: Longitudinal case studies of early elementary science instruction after professional development , 2019, Journal of Educational Change.
[22] Scott E. Grapin,et al. Science and language integration with English learners: A conceptual framework guiding instructional materials development , 2019, Science Education.
[23] Kathryn N. Hayes,et al. Understanding teacher instructional change: the case of integrating NGSS and stewardship in professional development , 2019 .
[24] Vesal Dini,et al. “Do I feel threatened? No… I’m learning!”—Affective and relational dynamics in science professional development , 2018, Science Education.
[25] Fengfeng Ke,et al. Examining features of how professional development and enactment of educative curricula influences elementary science teacher learning , 2018, Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
[26] Leema K. Berland,et al. Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards , 2018 .
[27] Eve Manz,et al. Supporting teachers to negotiate uncertainty for science, students, and teaching , 2018 .
[28] Rosemary S. Russ,et al. Defining sensemaking: Bringing clarity to a fragmented theoretical construct , 2018, Science Education.
[29] Abigail Jurist Levy,et al. Investigating relationships between school context, teacher professional development, teaching practices, and student achievement in response to a nationwide science reform , 2018 .
[30] Tijmen M. Schipper,et al. Professional growth in adaptive teaching competence as a result of Lesson Study , 2017 .
[31] T. Tal,et al. Teachers’ Practice a Decade After an Extensive Professional Development Program in Science Education , 2017 .
[32] Melissa J. Luna,et al. Using a video club design to promote teacher attention to students' ideas in science , 2017 .
[33] B. Doig,et al. Teachers’ professional growth through engagement with lesson study , 2017 .
[34] E. Furtak. Confronting dilemmas posed by three‐dimensional classroom assessment: Introduction to a virtual issue of Science Education , 2017 .
[35] M. Windschitl,et al. The Three-Story Challenge , 2017 .
[36] J. V. van Driel,et al. Identifying pathways of teachers’ PCK development , 2017 .
[37] Suzanne H. Jones,et al. Factors influencing teacher appropriation of professional learning focused on the use of technology in science classrooms , 2017 .
[38] M. Kennedy. How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching? , 2016 .
[39] Christine L. Bae,et al. The Diverse Faces of Teacher Leadership , 2016 .
[40] M. Windschitl,et al. Rigor in Elementary Science Students' Discourse: The Role of Responsiveness and Supportive Conditions for Talk. , 2016 .
[41] F. Korthagen,et al. Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0 , 2016 .
[42] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Teachers' Pedagogical Design Capacity for Scientific Argumentation. , 2016 .
[43] Kathryn N. Hayes,et al. Testing Predictors of Instructional Practice in Elementary Science Education: The Significant Role of Accountability , 2016 .
[44] David Hammer,et al. Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics , 2015 .
[45] C. W. Anderson,et al. Supporting Preservice Science Teachers' Ability to Attend and Respond to Student Thinking by Design , 2015 .
[46] Elizabeth B. Lewis,et al. Science Teaching Reform Through Professional Development: Teachers’ Use of a Scientific Classroom Discourse Community Model , 2015 .
[47] Cathy Ringstaff,et al. Inspiring Instructional Change in Elementary School Science: The Relationship Between Enhanced Self-efficacy and Teacher Practices , 2014 .
[48] David Stroupe. Examining Classroom Science Practice Communities: How Teachers and Students Negotiate Epistemic Agency and Learn Science-as-Practice , 2014 .
[49] H. Doerr,et al. Mathematics teachers’ learning: a conceptual framework and synthesis of research , 2014 .
[50] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K–12 Teachers , 2013 .
[51] L. Shulman. Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 2013 .
[52] Suzanne M. Wilson,et al. Professional Development for Science Teachers , 2013, Science.
[53] Melissa J. Luna,et al. Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing , 2013 .
[54] Eve Manz,et al. Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge , 2012 .
[55] David Stroupe,et al. Proposing a Core Set of Instructional Practices and Tools for Teachers of Science , 2012 .
[56] J. V. van Driel,et al. Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: a review of design features and quality of research , 2012 .
[57] M. Goedhart,et al. The Interconnected Model of Professional Growth as a means to assess the development of a mathematics teacher , 2012 .
[58] Richard Lehrer,et al. Seeding Evolutionary Thinking by Engaging Children in Modeling Its Foundations. , 2012 .
[59] Birgitte Lund Nielsen. Science Teachers’ Meaning-Making When Involved in a School-Based Professional Development Project , 2012 .
[60] Luke Miratrix,et al. Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science , 2012 .
[61] J. Voogt,et al. Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design. , 2011 .
[62] David Pedder,et al. Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning , 2011 .
[63] A. Pilot,et al. Exploring a Framework for Professional Development in Curriculum Innovation: Empowering Teachers for Designing Context-Based Chemistry Education , 2011 .
[64] Kathleen J. Roth,et al. Videobased Lesson Analysis: Effective Science PD for Teacher and Student Learning , 2011 .
[65] Randolph A. Philipp,et al. Professional Noticing of Children's Mathematical Thinking. , 2010 .
[66] Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al. Is Alignment Enough? Investigating the Effects of State Policies and Professional Development on Science Curriculum Implementation. , 2009 .
[67] E. Davis,et al. Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching , 2009 .
[68] Tcm Theo Bergen,et al. Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching , 2007 .
[69] Rosária Justi,et al. The use of the Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth for understanding the development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling , 2006 .
[70] David Hammer,et al. Learning and Teaching Science as Inquiry: A Case Study of Elementary School Teachers' Investigations of Light. , 2005 .
[71] Okhee Lee,et al. Dilemmas in Scaling Up Innovations in Elementary Science Instruction With Nonmainstream Students , 2005 .
[72] I. Arievitch,et al. Connecting Sociocultural Theory and Educational Practice: Galperin's Approach , 2005 .
[73] M. G. Sherin,et al. Teacher Learning in the Context of a Video Club. , 2004 .
[74] T. Guskey. Professional Development and Teacher Change , 2002 .
[75] M. Miles,et al. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion , 2002 .
[76] Sheila W. Valencia,et al. Appropriating Tools for Teaching English: A Theoretical Framework for Research on Learning to Teach , 1999, American Journal of Education.
[77] S. Loucks-Horsley. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .
[78] Social Constructivism , 2020, The SAGE Encyclopedia of the Sociology of Religion.
[79] J. Vermunt,et al. Strategies to support teachers' professional development regarding sense‐making in context‐based science curricula , 2020 .
[80] E. V. Es,et al. Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking , 2015 .
[81] Alicia C. Alonzo,et al. The Nature of Student Thinking and Its Implications for the Use of Learning Progressions to Inform Classroom Instruction , 2014, ICLS.
[82] Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes , 2011 .
[83] Angela Calabrese Barton,et al. Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space , 2009 .
[84] Maria Varelas,et al. Urban primary‐grade children think and talk science: Curricular and instructional practices that nurture participation and argumentation , 2008 .
[85] Andrew C. Porter,et al. Association What Makes Professional Development Effective ? Results from a National Sample of Teachers , 2007 .
[86] Bhaskar Upadhyay. Using students' lived experiences in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher's thinking , 2006 .
[87] Elizabeth Fennema,et al. Capturing Teachers’ Generative Change: A Follow-Up Study of Professional Development in Mathematics , 2001 .
[88] R. Yager. The Constructivist Learning Model. , 2000 .