Soft tissue neck injuries or cervical spine distortion injuries (CSD) are dominant injuries in all claimed car collisions. The injury mechanisms are currently not fully understood because some symptoms are rated subjectively and even modern radiological imaging techniques (CT, MRI, PET, etc.) cannot detect structures damaged. One attempt was made using the new internationally accepted QTF (Quebec Task Force) classification on CSD injuries to differentiate between three grades (1 = microlesion, 2 = muskulosceletal, 3 = neurological) of this minor (AIS 1) injury within a large amount of retrospective insurance data material, which covers 15,000 car to car collisions with injured occupants in Germany. From this sample, 517 rear-end collisions have been analyzed medically and technically in order to get an overview about the real accident scenario. The task of the accident investigation is to identify risk factors and population at risk, and to define countermeasures. Summarizing the conclusions, it can be said that females showed a generally higher risk and older people showed a higher risk for high graded CSD injuries. The QTF injury degree positively correlates with time of work absence and full recovery but not with j v, which could be biased through a high aggravation rate in the lower j v ranges. First results indicate that high-positioned head restraints have a significant protection effect, whereas no headrests and low-positioned head restraints lead to a higher injury incidence. A human volunteer sled test series based on different anthropometric measurements will be discussed. Forty-three rear end sled tests performed at the same car seat and two j v ranges have been performed. Because females show in most real world accident analysis a higher injury incidence, 6 tests with females have been performed with the aim to detect possible differences. Possible correlation between different parameters was tested statistically. It was shown that neck circumference correlates well with peak head x -acceleration. Moreover, muscular electrode measurements for the deep and superficial cervical musculature during a rear end impact sled test series with volunteers ( j v 6.5 and 9.5 km/h) are presented. This test series also integrates the deep Musculus semispinalis capitis, which could be associated with common muscular pain after CSD. The current injury hypothesis describes now 3 phases (extension, head-impact, rebound), because muscular measurement shows also at the rebound phase a maximum contraction of the deep cervical spine muscles. Seat comparison tests had been performed with two different dummies (HIII TRID, BIORID 2); the realism and possible biomechanical evaluation criteria will be discussed.
[1]
Ola Boström,et al.
Evaluation of the applicability of the neck injury criterion (NIC) in rear end impacts on the basis of human subject tests
,
1998
.
[2]
Felix H. Walz,et al.
Injury Criteria Applied to Seat Comparison Tests
,
2002
.
[3]
Felix H. Walz,et al.
Consequences for seat design due to rear end accident analysis, sled tests and possible test criteria for reducing cervical spine injuries after rear-end collision
,
1999
.
[4]
Markus H. Muser,et al.
NECK INJURY PREVENTION BY AUTOMATICALLY POSITIONED HEAD RESTRAINT
,
1994
.
[5]
J. Temming,et al.
Frequency and risk of cervical spine distortion injuries in passenger car accidents: significance of human factors data
,
1998
.
[6]
Arno Eichberger,et al.
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CAR SEATS REGARDING HEAD-NECK KINEMATICS OF VOLUNTEERS DURING REAR END IMPACT
,
1997
.
[7]
Felix H. Walz,et al.
REPORTED SOFT TISSUE NECK INJURIES AFTER REAR-END CAR COLLISIONS
,
1998
.
[8]
W. Spitzer,et al.
Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management.
,
1995,
Spine.
[9]
Felix H. Walz,et al.
SICHERHEITS-SITZ FUER LEICHTFAHRZEUGE. VERMINDERUNG VON HALSWIRBELSAEULENVERLETZUNGEN BEI HECKKOLLISIONEN
,
1997
.
[10]
Harald Zellmer,et al.
Evolution of a dynamic seat test standard proposal for a better protection after rear-end impact
,
2000
.
[11]
van den Aj Kroonenberg,et al.
HUMAN HEAD-NECK RESPONSE DURING LOW-SPEED REAR END IMPACTS
,
1998
.
[12]
Anders Kullgren,et al.
Influence of Crash Pulse Characteristics on Whiplash Associated Disorders in Rear Impacts--Crash Recording in Real Life Crashes
,
2002
.
[13]
Peter Niederer,et al.
On the Role of Cervical Facet Joints in Rear End Impact Neck Injury Mechanisms
,
1997
.
[14]
Claes Tingvall,et al.
Prediction of neck injuries in rear impacts based on accident data and simulations
,
1997
.
[15]
D. Viano,et al.
The effectiveness of active head restraint in preventing whiplash.
,
2001,
The Journal of trauma.
[16]
Harald Zellmer,et al.
BIOMECHANICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE REBOUND PHASE IN LOW SPEED REAR END IMPACTS
,
2000
.
[17]
C. Tingvall,et al.
Influence of Crash Pulse Characteristics on Whiplash Associated Disorders in Rear Impacts—Crash Recording in Real Life Crashes
,
2003
.
[18]
Felix H. Walz,et al.
BIOMECHANICAL ASPECTS OF CERVICAL SPINE INJURIES
,
1995
.