Optimization of operating conditions in photon-counting multi-slit mammography based on Si-strip detectors

Measurements and simulations of the signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) and average glandular dose (AGD) have been performed on a photon counting full-field digital mammography system to determine the optimal operating conditions. Several beam qualities were experimentally evaluated by using different combinations of tube voltage, added filters and thickness of BR12 with a tungsten target x-ray tube. The SDNR and AGD were also calculated theoretically for an extended number of operating conditions and a more accurate breast model. As figure of merit for each operating condition, a spectral quantum efficiency (SQE) was calculated as the polychromatic SDNR squared over the optimal monochromatic SDNR squared at the same AGD. The theoretical model agreed within ±4% relative the measured SDNR throughout the evaluated breast thickness (30-70 mm) and tube voltage range (26-38 kV). The optimization was performed with a constant SDNR-rate as compared to using a fixed filter thickness. The optimal combinations of tube voltage-filter material were: 32 kV-Ag, 34 kV-Cd, 36 kV-Sn for a breast thickness of 30, 50 and 70 mm respectively. These K-edge filter materials increased the SQE by less than 4% compared to the optimal Al filtration.

[1]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: optimal spectra for digital mammography. , 1996, Medical physics.

[2]  J M Boone,et al.  Comparison of x-ray cross sections for diagnostic and therapeutic medical physics. , 1996, Medical physics.

[3]  Remy Klausz,et al.  Optimized exposure control in digital mammography , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[5]  Daniel B. Kopans,et al.  Experimental and theoretical spectral optimization for digital mammography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[7]  Walter Huda,et al.  Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  Björn Cederström,et al.  Evaluation of a photon counting X-ray imaging system , 2000 .

[9]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[10]  M. Danielsson,et al.  Computer simulations and performance measurements on a silicon strip detector for edge-on imaging , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[11]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  D R Dance,et al.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  M Danos,et al.  Image information content and patient exposure. , 1978, Medical physics.