Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mixing.

Six laboratory scale biogas mixed anaerobic digesters were operated to study the effect of biogas recycling rates and draft tube height on their performance. The digesters produced methane at 0.40-0.45 L per liter of digester volume per day. A higher methane production rate was observed in unmixed digesters, while increased biogas circulation rate reduced methane production. However, different draft tube heights caused no difference in the methane production rate. Air infiltration (up to 15% oxygen in the biogas) was observed in the digesters mixed by biogas recirculation. Slight air permeability of tubing or leakage on the vacuum side of the air pump may have caused the observed air infiltration. The similar performance of the mixed and unmixed digesters might be the result of the low solids concentration (50 g dry solids per liter of slurry) in the fed animal slurry, which could be sufficiently mixed by the naturally produced biogas.

[1]  D. J. Elliot,et al.  Mixing in upflow anaerobic filters and its influence on performance and scale-up , 1996 .

[2]  Peter-John Meynell,et al.  Methane: Planning a Digester , 1976 .

[3]  L. A. Roth,et al.  Death rates of obligate anaerobes exposed to oxygen and the effect of media prereduction on cell viability , 1984 .

[4]  Steven C. Ricke,et al.  Attached-film media performance in psychrophilic anaerobic treatment of dairy cattle wastewater , 1997 .

[5]  W. A. Dietz,et al.  Response Factors for Gas Chromatographic Analyses , 1967 .

[6]  Jay S. Grumbling,et al.  Fundamental Considerations in High-Rate Digestion , 1960 .

[7]  M. Smart,et al.  Determination of total nitrogen in sediments and plants using persulfate digestion. An evaluation and comparison with the Kjeldahl procedure , 1983 .

[8]  Paul N. Sharratt,et al.  Modelling the effects of imperfect mixing on the performance of anaerobic reactors for sewage sludge treatment , 1998 .

[9]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Gas holdup in bubble columns at elevated pressure via computed tomography , 2001 .

[10]  Sang Rak Lee,et al.  Using the pressure of biogas created during anaerobic digestion as the source of mixing power. , 1995 .

[11]  A. Ghaly,et al.  Continuous production of biogas from dairy manure using an innovative no-mix reactor , 1989 .

[12]  Merry Buckley,et al.  Microbial Energy Conversion , 2006 .

[13]  R. Shannon,et al.  Evaluation of a second derivative UV/visible spectroscopy technique for nitrate and total nitrogen analysis of wastewater samples. , 2001, Water research.

[14]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Particle motion in packed/ebullated beds by CT and CARPT , 2001 .

[15]  P. Lusk,et al.  Methane Recovery from Animal Manures The Current Opportunities Casebook , 1994 .

[16]  H. G. Konstandt.  ENGINEERING, OPERATION AND ECONOMICS OF METHANE GAS PRODUCTION , 1977 .

[17]  Richard E. Speece,et al.  Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters , 1996 .

[18]  S. Qasim,et al.  Methane gas production from anaerobic digestion of cattle manure , 1984 .

[19]  J. Weiel,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of cellulose—Dairy cattle manure mixtures , 1983 .

[20]  M. Duduković,et al.  A method for estimating the solids circulation rate in a closed-loop circulating fluidized bed , 2001 .