Improvement of information fusion-based audio steganalysis

In the paper we extend an existing information fusion based audio steganalysis approach by three different kinds of evaluations: The first evaluation addresses the so far neglected evaluations on sensor level fusion. Our results show that this fusion removes content dependability while being capable of achieving similar classification rates (especially for the considered global features) if compared to single classifiers on the three exemplarily tested audio data hiding algorithms. The second evaluation enhances the observations on fusion from considering only segmental features to combinations of segmental and global features, with the result of a reduction of the required computational complexity for testing by about two magnitudes while maintaining the same degree of accuracy. The third evaluation tries to build a basis for estimating the plausibility of the introduced steganalysis approach by measuring the sensibility of the models used in supervised classification of steganographic material against typical signal modification operations like de-noising or 128kBit/s MP3 encoding. Our results show that for some of the tested classifiers the probability of false alarms rises dramatically after such modifications.

[1]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Quantitative steganalysis of digital images: estimating the secret message length , 2003, Multimedia Systems.

[2]  Anto Zecevic Ein sprachgestütztes Trainingssystem zur Evaluierung der Nasalität , 2002 .

[3]  Sabine Keuser Similarity search on musical data , 2002 .

[4]  Nasir D. Memon,et al.  Improving Steganalysis by Fusion Techniques: A Case Study with Image Steganography , 2006, Trans. Data Hiding Multim. Secur..

[5]  Jan Lukás,et al.  Determining digital image origin using sensor imperfections , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Andreas Lang Audio watermarking benchmarking: a profile based approach , 2007 .

[7]  Qingzhong Liu,et al.  Temporal Derivative-Based Spectrum and Mel-Cepstrum Audio Steganalysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[8]  Nasir D. Memon,et al.  Steganalysis of audio based on audio quality metrics , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Jana Dittmann,et al.  Mel-cepstrum-based steganalysis for VoIP steganography , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Ismail Avcibas Audio steganalysis with content-independent distortion measures , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Jana Dittmann,et al.  Pros and Cons of Mel-cepstrum Based Audio Steganalysis Using SVM Classification , 2007, Information Hiding.

[12]  Jana Dittmann,et al.  Microphone Classification Using Fourier Coefficients , 2009, Information Hiding.

[13]  Tomás Pevný,et al.  Merging Markov and DCT features for multi-class JPEG steganalysis , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[15]  Hong-Juan Zhang,et al.  Steganalysis of audio: attacking the Steghide , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[16]  Jana Dittmann,et al.  The impact of information fusion in steganalysis on the example of audio steganalysis , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Jana Dittmann,et al.  Impact of feature selection in classification for hidden channel detection on the example of audio data hiding , 2008, MM&Sec '08.

[18]  Petri Toiviainen,et al.  Exploring Relationships between the Kinematics of a Singer's Body Movement and the Quality of Their Voice , 2008 .