A Quasi-Analytical Model for Energy-Delay-Reliability Tradeoff Studies During Write Operations in a Perpendicular STT-RAM Cell

One of the biggest challenges that the current spin-transfer-torque-based random access memory (STT-RAM) industry faces is maintaining high thermal stability while trying to switch within a given voltage pulse and energy cost. In this paper, we present a physics-based analytical model that uses a modified Simmons tunneling expression to capture the spin-dependent tunneling in a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ). Coupled with an analytical derivation of the critical switching current based on the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation and the write error rate derived from a solution to the Fokker–Planck equation, this model provides us a quick estimate of the energy-delay-reliability tradeoffs in perpendicular STT-RAM devices due to thermal fluctuations. In other words, the model provides a simple way to calculate the energy consumed during write operation that ensures a certain error rate and delay time while being numerically far less intensive than a full-fledged stochastic calculation. We calculate the worst case energy consumption during antiparallel (AP)-to-parallel (P) and P-to-AP switchings and quantify how increasing the anisotropy field $H_{K}$ and lowering the saturation magnetization $M_{S}$ can significantly reduce the energy consumption. A case study on how manufacturing variations of the MTJ cell can affect the energy consumption and delay is also reported.

[1]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Thermal fluctuation effects on spin torque induced switching: Mean and variations , 2008 .

[2]  J. Tschanz,et al.  Design Space Exploration of Typical STT MTJ Stacks in Memory Arrays in the Presence of Variability and Disturbances , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[3]  Slonczewski Conductance and exchange coupling of two ferromagnets separated by a tunneling barrier. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[4]  S. Datta,et al.  Voltage Asymmetry of Spin-Transfer Torques , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[5]  Slonczewski Jc,et al.  Conductance and exchange coupling of two ferromagnets separated by a tunneling barrier. , 1989 .

[6]  Mircea R. Stan,et al.  Advances and Future Prospects of Spin-Transfer Torque Random Access Memory , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  Jonathan Z. Sun Spin-current interaction with a monodomain magnetic body: A model study , 2000 .

[8]  Stuart A. Wolf,et al.  Spintronics : A Spin-Based Electronics Vision for the Future , 2009 .

[9]  J.E. Brewer,et al.  Emerging research memory and logic technologies , 2005, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine.

[10]  Arijit Raychowdhury,et al.  Design space and scalability exploration of 1T-1STT MTJ memory arrays in the presence of variability and disturbances , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).

[11]  W. Butler,et al.  Tunneling magnetoresistance from a symmetry filtering effect , 2008, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[12]  H. Ohno,et al.  A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction. , 2010, Nature materials.

[13]  J. Slonczewski Currents, torques, and polarization factors in magnetic tunnel junctions , 2004, cond-mat/0404210.

[14]  S. Yuasa,et al.  Quantitative measurement of voltage dependence of spin-transfer torque in MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions , 2008 .

[15]  Yiming Huai,et al.  Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM): Challenges and Prospects , 2008 .

[16]  J.E. Brewer,et al.  Emerging research logic devices , 2005, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine.

[17]  John G. Simmons,et al.  Low‐Voltage Current‐Voltage Relationship of Tunnel Junctions , 1963 .

[18]  W. Rippard,et al.  Switching Distributions for Perpendicular Spin-Torque Devices Within the Macrospin Approximation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.