Kooperative Mensch-Maschine-Systeme in der Chirurgie und Rehabilitation (Cooperative Human-Machine Systems in Surgery and Rehabilitation)

Bestmögliche Funktionalität bei optimierter Nutzungssicherheit sind wesentliche Zielkriterien für die Gestaltung von Unterstützungssystemen. Eine Möglichkeit ist die Nutzung von kooperativen Mensch-Maschine-Systemen. Eine Übersicht über den Entwurf und die Evaluation von solchen kooperativen Systemen ist Thema des vorliegenden Artikels. Im Wesentlichen werden die Optimierung der Funktionalität und der Sicherheit sowie der Verlässlichkeit von kooperativen Systemen untersucht. Abschließend werden Anwendungsbeispiele aus der Chirurgie und Rehabilitation vorgestellt. The optimal functionality combined with the safety are the essential criteria for support systems design. One possibility is the application of cooperative Human-Machine Systems. The objective of this article is to present an overview of the design, implementation and evaluation of cooperative Human-Machine Systems. In particular, functionality optimization, safety and reliability of such systems will be examined and analyzed. Finally we present different applications in the area of surgery and rehabilitation.

[1]  Sandra Martelli,et al.  Criteria of interface evaluation for computer assisted surgery systems , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  H. Stammberger,et al.  Functional endoscopic sinus surgery * Concept , indications and results of the Messerklinger technique , 2022 .

[3]  Robert H. Baud,et al.  GALEN: a third generation terminology tool to support a multipurpose national coding system for surgical procedures , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  Andreas Zimolong.  Verfahren zur Zuverlässigkeitsbeurteilung der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion bei computergestützten Chirurgiesystemen , 2004 .

[5]  A R Mandel,et al.  Electromyographic versus rhythmic positional biofeedback in computerized gait retraining with stroke patients. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  Rapid Thermal Multiprocessor,et al.  Supervisory Control of a , 1993 .

[8]  R. Labadie,et al.  Intratympanic Dexamethasone for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Failure of Systemic Therapy , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  P. A. Finlay,et al.  Controlling the movement of a surgical laparoscope , 1995 .

[10]  A Winter,et al.  Modeling Hospital Information Systems (Part 2): using the 3LGM2 tool for modeling patient record management. , 2004, Methods of information in medicine.

[11]  Heinz U. Lemke.  Imaging, Communication and Perceptions , 1989 .

[12]  Pd Dr. med. Norbert Kleinsasser.  Chondrosynthese des laryngo-trachealen - Skeletts mit resorbierbaren Stiften und Platten , 2005 .

[13]  W. Korb,et al.  The Navigation‐Controlled Drill in Temporal Bone Surgery: A Feasibility Study , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  R. Bittner.  Trocars and other devices for access , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[15]  P. Ström,et al.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[16]  R. Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Tim C. Lueth,et al.  FESS control: Realization and evaluation of navigated control for functional endoscopic sinus surgery , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[18]  W Messerklinger,et al.  [Technics and possibilities of nasal endoscopy]. , 1972, HNO.

[19]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency' , 1993 .

[20]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[21]  F. Mohr,et al.  Computer-enhanced endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: the da Vinci experience. , 2003, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[23]  Michael W. Vannier,et al.  International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery , 2006, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[24]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Special Section Commentary: Opportunities and Challenges for Human Factors and Ergonomics in Enhancing Patient Safety , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[25]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models , 2000, Ergonomics.

[26]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[27]  C. Trantakis,et al.  Ein Konzept für eine automatisierte Endoskopführung für die Nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie , 2007, HNO.

[28]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[29]  Richard H. M. Goossens,et al.  Assessment of ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.