The Effect of Maker-Taker Pricing on Market Liquidity in Electronic Trading Systems – Empirical Evidence from European Equity Trading

European equity trading mainly takes place in electronic order-driven systems. In those systems two groups of traders post their orders. One group makes liquidity by submitting limit orders while the other takes liquidity by submitting market orders. A high degree of liquidity is widely seen as the most important criterion for a market’s quality and efficiency. The introduction of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive led to the emergence of new trading venues across Europe. Those venues prefer traders making liquidity by the fees they charge in order to improve liquidity and attract market share from established exchanges. This is referred to as maker-taker pricing. Although controversial and not proven if it is advisable for an established exchange to do the same, some exchanges also introduced maker-taker pricing against the background of that new competition. In this paper we will empirically investigate the introduction of maker-taker pricing by the SWX Europe Exchange and its impact on market liquidity by means of an event study methodology. Our findings suggest that maker-taker pricing does not affect spreads, but leads to an increase in the number of shares quoted at the top of the order book.

[1]  Charles M. Jones,et al.  Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity? , 2010 .

[2]  Jason T. Greene,et al.  Does the Limit Order Routing Decision Matter , 2002 .

[3]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference with Multi-Way Clustering , 2006 .

[4]  Duane J. Seppi,et al.  Common Factors in Prices, Order Flows and Liquidity , 1998 .

[5]  Michael Chlistalla,et al.  The Impact of New Execution Venues on European Equity Markets' Liquidity - The Case of Chi-X , 2009, AMCIS/SIGeBIZ.

[6]  Paul J. Irvine,et al.  Liquidity Beyond the Inside Spread: Measuring and Using Information in the Limit Order Book , 2000 .

[7]  H. Degryse,et al.  Alternative Trading Systems and Liquidity , 2001 .

[8]  Peter Gomber,et al.  Smart Order Routing Technology in the New European Equity Trading Landscape , 2009, I3E.

[9]  B. Thompson Foundations of behavioral statistics : an insight-based approach , 2006 .

[10]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[11]  Ian Domowitz,et al.  Liquidity, Volatility and Equity Trading Costs Across Countries and Over Time , 2001 .

[12]  Robert Kissell,et al.  Algorithmic Decision-Making Framework , 2005, Algorithmic Trading Methods.

[13]  Peter Gomber,et al.  Zooming in on Liquidity , 2004 .

[14]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[15]  J. Gajewski,et al.  Trading Costs Analysis: A Comparison of Euronext Paris and the London Stock Exchange , 2002 .

[16]  Peter Gomber,et al.  Applying Pricing Engineering for Electronic Financial Markets , 2007, Electron. Mark..

[17]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Two-Sided Markets and Electronic Intermediaries , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.