Acceptance and equity in advanced path-related road pricing schemes

The impact of the transport sector range between 20% and 40% in terms of consumption of fossil fuels and emissions. Many urban areas are trying to adopt planning strategies aimed at reducing the car usage and their emissions reaching a sustainable mobility. The introduction of a toll for the use of a road infrastructure and/or a service is one of the most common Transportation Demand Management policy. The development of the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technologies allow extending and applying these pricing schemes (both for passenger and for freight) in several different and most rational (sustainable) ways, connecting the price both to the individual characteristics of the trip and to the type of vehicle used. The aim of the study is to propose an original transport-related acceptance & equity measure useful for enlarging both the consensus and the equity in the design of a road pricing scheme. Results of the research underline the importance in introducing acceptance&equity measures as an additional design criteria in road pricing schemes, jointly with the traditional ones (e.g. road traffic congestion reduction and pollutant reduction).

[1]  J. Ortúzar,et al.  Increasing the acceptability of a congestion charging scheme , 2015 .

[2]  Erik T. Verhoef,et al.  Pricing, capacity choice and financing in transportation networks , 2004 .

[3]  Romeo Danielis,et al.  A medium term evaluation of the Ecopass road pricing scheme in Milan: economic, environmental and transport impacts , 2012 .

[4]  Georgina Santos,et al.  The impact of the London congestion charging scheme on the generalised cost of car commuters to the city of London from a value of travel time savings perspective , 2006 .

[5]  Guido Gentile,et al.  Section 7.5 - Dynamic traffic assignment with non separable link cost functions and queue spillovers , 2009 .

[6]  Sock-Yong Phang,et al.  From manual to electronic road congestion pricing: The Singapore experience and experiment , 1997 .

[7]  Paolo Ferrari,et al.  Road pricing and users' surplus , 2005 .

[8]  J. Viegas Making urban road pricing acceptable and effective: searching for quality and equity in urban mobility , 2001 .

[9]  M. Percoco The impact of road pricing on housing prices: Preliminary evidence from Milan , 2014 .

[10]  Liisa Ecola,et al.  Equity and Congestion Pricing: A Review of the Evidence , 2009 .

[11]  D. Levinson Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review , 2010 .

[12]  S. Fujii,et al.  Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students , 2013 .

[13]  J. Odeck,et al.  Evidence on users' attitudes towards road user charges--A cross-sectional survey of six Norwegian toll schemes , 2010 .

[14]  Anthony D. May,et al.  Overcoming the barriers to implementing urban road user charging schemes , 2010 .

[15]  Armando Cartenì,et al.  Urban sustainable mobility. Part 1: Rationality in transport planning , 2014 .

[16]  Mark Goh,et al.  Congestion management and electronic road pricing in Singapore , 2002 .

[17]  G. Wets,et al.  The Socio-Cognitive Links between Road Pricing Acceptability and Changes in Travel-Behavior , 2011 .

[18]  André de Palma,et al.  Maintenance, Service Quality and Congestion Pricing with Competing Roads , 2007 .

[20]  Armando Cartenì,et al.  A random utility model for park & carsharing services and the pure preference for electric vehicles , 2016 .

[21]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  Travel Time Cost Functions For Urban Roads:A Case Study In Italy , 2007 .

[22]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis , 2009 .

[23]  Foo Tuan Seik An advanced demand management instrument in urban transport , 2000 .

[24]  S. Beevers,et al.  The impact of congestion charging on vehicle emissions in London , 2005 .

[25]  郑俊 Maintenance , 2002, The Islamic Law of Personal Status.

[26]  Armando Cartenì,et al.  Stochastic equilibrium assignment with variable demand: Theoretical and implementation issues , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  G. Santos,et al.  Road Pricing: Lessons from London , 2006 .

[28]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: a decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods , 2015 .