As vehicles become more fuel-efficient and overall levels of travel stagnate in response to increases in fuel prices, conventional sources of revenue for transportation finance such as taxes on motor fuels have been put under increasing pressure. One potential alternative as a source of revenue is a set of policies collectively referred to as value capture policies. In contrast to fuel taxes and other instruments that impose charges on users of transportation networks, value capture policies seek to generate revenue by extracting a portion of the gains in the value of land that result from improvements to transportation networks. In this report the authors identify a set of eight policies that contain elements of the value capture approach. These policies include land value taxes, tax increment financing, special assessments, transportation utility fees, development impact fees, negotiated exactions, joint development, and air rights. Each of the policies is evaluated according to four criteria: 1) efficiency, which relates to how well the policies allocate scarce resources, 2) equity, which describes the fairness of resource allocation among different strata of society, 3) sustainability, which refers to the ability of the policy to serve as an adequate, reliable source of transportation revenue, and 4) feasibility, which refers to the degree of political and administrative difficulty associated with each policy. Since these policies are targeted toward use at the state and local level in Minnesota, the authors conclude by examining some legal and administrative issues related to the implementation of each policy with special reference to Minnesota.
[1]
Michael A. Stegman,et al.
Who bears the burden of development impact fees? ( USA)
,
1988
.
[2]
T. Stinson.
Subsidizing Local Economic Development Through Tax Increment Financing
,
1992
.
[3]
W. Fischel,et al.
Regulation for Revenue: The Political Economy of Land Use Exactions
,
1993
.
[4]
P. Stopher.
Financing urban rail projects: The case of Los Angeles
,
1993
.
[5]
D. Lawrence,et al.
The Economics and Politics of Tax Increment Financing
,
1995
.
[6]
Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.
Growth management principles and practices
,
1995
.
[7]
D. Levinson.
The Limits to Growth Management: Development Regulation in Montgomery County, Maryland
,
1997
.
[8]
J. Yinger.
THE INCIDENCE OF DEVELOPMENT FEES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
,
1998,
National Tax Journal.
[9]
R. Dye,et al.
The Effects of Tax Increment Financing on Economic Development
,
2000
.
[10]
Joseph R. Morris,et al.
The Fuel Tax and Alternatives for Transportation Funding
,
2006
.
[11]
Barbara J. Vandrasek,et al.
Transportation as Catalyst for Community Economic Development
,
2007
.