Vessel-based rigid registration for endovascular therapy of the abdominal aorta

Abstract Background: Combining electromagnetic tracking of instruments with preoperatively acquired images can provide detailed visualization for intraoperative guidance and reduce the need for fluoroscopy and contrast. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of a vessel-based registration method designed for matching preoperative image and electromagnetically tracked positions for endovascular therapy. Material and methods: An open-source registration method was used to match the centerline extracted from computed tomography (CT) to electromagnetically tracked positions within a vascular phantom representing the abdominal aorta with bifurcations. The target registration error (TRE) was calculated for 11 fiducials distributed over the phantom. Median and intra-quartile range (IQR) for 30 registrations was reported. TRE < 5 mm was claimed sufficient for endovascular navigation, evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. TRE was also compared to a 3D-3D registration method based on intraoperative cone-beam CT, using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: The TRE was 3.75 (IQR: 3.48–3.99) mm for the centerline registration algorithm and 3.21 (IQR: 1.50–3.57) mm for the 3D-3D method (p < .001). For both methods, the TRE was significantly < 5 mm (p < .001). Conclusion: The centerline registration method was feasible, with an accuracy sufficient for navigation in endovascular therapy. The centerline method avoids additional image acquisition for registration purpose only.

[1]  M. V. van Strijen,et al.  Pros and Cons of 3D Image Fusion in Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[2]  Erlend Fagertun Hofstad,et al.  CustusX: an open-source research platform for image-guided therapy , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[3]  P Haigron,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for registration and navigation in endovascular aneurysm repair: a phantom study. , 2012, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[4]  T. Huber,et al.  Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. , 2015, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  Hui Ding,et al.  The study of fiducial localization error of image in point-based registration , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  R. Uflacker,et al.  Normal renal arterial anatomy assessed by multidetector CT angiography: Are there differences between men and women? , 2009, Clinical anatomy.

[7]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  Erlend Fagertun Hofstad,et al.  A multimodal image guiding system for Navigated Ultrasound Bronchoscopy (EBUS): A human feasibility study , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  A. Saratzis,et al.  Acute Kidney Injury After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2013, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[10]  S. Demirci,et al.  Endovascular image-guided navigation - validation of two volume-volume registration algorithms , 2011, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[11]  The 2D-3D Registration Method in Image Fusion Is Accurate and Helps to Reduce the Used Contrast Medium, Radiation, and Procedural Time in Standard EVAR Procedures. , 2018, Annals of vascular surgery.

[12]  Raquel Herranz Pérez,et al.  Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia: CT findings, clinical outcomes and assessment of the diameter of the superior mesenteric artery. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Image fusion during vascular and nonvascular image-guided procedures. , 2013, Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology.

[14]  M Ginks,et al.  2D–3D registration of cardiac images using catheter constraints , 2009, 2009 36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[15]  F. Manstad-Hulaas,et al.  Three-Dimensional Electromagnetic Navigation vs. Fluoroscopy for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Prospective Feasibility Study in Patients , 2012, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[16]  Tapani Koivukangas,et al.  Technical accuracy of optical and the electromagnetic tracking systems , 2013, SpringerPlus.

[17]  Quantification of Respiratory Movement of the Aorta and Side Branches , 2015, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[18]  Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh,et al.  Electromagnetic navigation for thoracic aortic stent-graft deployment: a pilot study in swine. , 2010, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[19]  Geir Arne Tangen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Endovascular Navigation With Electromagnetic Tracking: Ex Vivo and In Vivo Accuracy , 2011, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[20]  L. E. Staxrud,et al.  Radiation exposure in patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair: what is the risk of cancer, and can we justify treating younger patients? , 2017, Acta radiologica.

[21]  Celia Riga,et al.  Improved Catheter Navigation With 3D Electromagnetic Guidance , 2013, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[22]  F. Moll,et al.  Current state in tracking and robotic navigation systems for application in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. , 2015, Journal of vascular surgery.