Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges

The paper sets out a proposal for bridging and linking three approaches to the analysis of transitions to sustainable and low-carbon societies: quantitative systems modelling; socio-technical transition analysis; and initiative-based learning. We argue that each of these approaches presents a partial and incomplete picture, which has implications for the quality and usefulness of the insights they can deliver for policy and practice. A framework for bridging these different approaches promises to enrich each of the approaches, while providing the basis for a more robust and complete analysis of sustainable transitions pathways that serves better to address questions and dilemmas faced by decision-makers and practitioners. We elaborate five key challenges for the analysis and governance of transitions pathways, and compare the three approaches in relation to each of these. We suggest an integration strategy based on alignment, bridging, and iteration, arguing that a structured dialogue between practitioners of different approaches is needed. In practical terms, such a dialogue would be organised around three areas of joint knowledge production: defining common analytical or governance problems to be tackled through integration; establishing shared concepts (boundary objects); and establishing operational bridging devices (data and metrics, pathways evaluation and their delivery). Such processes could include experts and societal partners. We draw conclusions about future research perspectives and the role of analysis in transitions governance.

[1]  André Thomsen,et al.  Replacement or renovation of dwellings: the relevance of a more sustainable approach , 2009 .

[2]  Neil Strachan,et al.  The structure of uncertainty in future low carbon pathways , 2013 .

[3]  Måns Nilsson,et al.  The EV paradox – A multilevel study of why Stockholm is not a leader in electric vehicles , 2015 .

[4]  M. Sutton,et al.  Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake , 2014 .

[5]  Patrícia Fortes,et al.  Long-term energy scenarios: : Bridging the gap between socio-economic storylines and energy modeling , 2015 .

[6]  Emilio Fontela,et al.  Bridging the gap between scenarios and models , 2000 .

[7]  R. Garud,et al.  Metatheoretical Perspectives on Sustainability Journeys: Evolutionary, Relational and Durational , 2012 .

[8]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[9]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[10]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it and how? , 2006 .

[11]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Places and Spaces of Sustainability Transitions: Geographical Contributions to an Emerging Research and Policy Field , 2012 .

[12]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[13]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[14]  Holger Rohn,et al.  User-integrated innovation in sustainable LivingLabs : an experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems , 2015 .

[15]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets , 2014, Science.

[16]  Catrien J.A.M. Termeer,et al.  Forms and foundations of action research , 2015 .

[17]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Branching points for transition pathways : assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future , 2013 .

[18]  Vincent Linderhof,et al.  How Sectors Can Contribute to Sustainable Use and Conservation of Biodiveristy. In: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.) CBD Technical Series. , 2014 .

[19]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future , 2013 .

[20]  D. L. Kelly,et al.  Integrated Assessment Models For Climate Change Control∗ , 1998 .

[21]  Julia Larkin,et al.  Are major economies on track to achieve their pledges for 2020? An assessment of domestic climate and energy policies , 2014 .

[22]  Will McDowall,et al.  Exploring possible transition pathways for hydrogen energy: A hybrid approach using socio-technical scenarios and energy system modelling , 2014 .

[23]  P. Martens,et al.  Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? , 2007 .

[24]  Siwa Msangi,et al.  Options to reduce the environmental effects of livestock production – Comparison of two economic models , 2013 .

[25]  K. Lewin.  Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[26]  J. Alcamo.  Environmental futures : the practice of environmental scenario analysis , 2008 .

[27]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. , 2015 .

[28]  Scott Jiusto,et al.  Assessing innovation in emerging energy technologies: Socio-technical dynamics of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in the USA , 2010 .

[29]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Exploring technology paths: The development of alternative transport fuels in Sweden 2005-2020 , 2008 .

[30]  J. Voss,et al.  The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management , 2011 .

[31]  Niko Roorda,et al.  Dynamic Sustainabilities , 2011 .

[32]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice , 2001 .

[33]  J. Wiseman,et al.  Post carbon pathways: A meta-analysis of 18 large-scale post carbon economy transition strategies , 2013 .

[34]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  A critical appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions , 2015 .

[35]  Frank Biermann,et al.  Roads from Rio+20 : Pathways to achieve global sustainability goals by 2050 , 2012 .

[36]  M. Pelling,et al.  Shadow Spaces for Social Learning: A Relational Understanding of Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change within Organisations , 2008 .

[37]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty from Model Calibration: Applying a New Method to Transport Energy Demand Modelling , 2010 .

[38]  Vincent Linderhof,et al.  How sectors can contribute to sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity , 2014 .

[39]  Clare M. Goodess,et al.  Representing Climate and Extreme Weather Events in Integrated Assessment Models: A Review of Existing Methods and Options for Development , 2003 .

[40]  Jamil Khan,et al.  Governing the transition to low-carbon futures: A critical survey of energy scenarios for 2050 , 2011 .

[41]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[42]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[43]  Yasushi Umeda,et al.  Enhancing Meso Level Research in Sustainability Science—Challenges and Research Needs , 2012 .

[44]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  An urban politics of climate change : experimentation and the governing of socio-technical transitions , 2015 .

[45]  U. Jørgensen.  Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development , 2012 .

[46]  Barbara Praetorius,et al.  Electricity Gap versus Climate Change: Electricity Politics and the Potential Role of CCS in Germany , 2009 .

[47]  Nick Hughes,et al.  Towards improving the relevance of scenarios for public policy questions: A proposed methodological framework for policy relevant low carbon scenarios , 2013 .

[48]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  How do we govern sustainable innovations? Mapping patterns of governance for biofuels and hybrid-electric vehicle technologies , 2012 .

[49]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  Local Demonstrations for Global Transitions—Dynamics across Governance Levels Fostering Socio-Technical Regime Change Towards Sustainability , 2012 .

[50]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Consumer Preferences Determine Resilience of Ecological-Economic Systems , 2011 .

[51]  Steve Pye,et al.  The iterative contribution and relevance of modelling to UK energy policy , 2009 .

[52]  Björn Nykvist,et al.  Ten times more difficult: Quantifying the carbon capture and storage challenge , 2013 .

[53]  Arie Rip,et al.  Identifying Loci for Influencing the Dynamics of Technological Development , 2002 .

[54]  Steven M. Manson,et al.  State of the art in simulating future changes in ecosystem services , 2005 .

[55]  George Papachristos,et al.  Towards multi-system sociotechnical transitions: why simulate , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[56]  S. Rohde,et al.  Room for rivers: An integrative search strategy for floodplain restoration , 2006 .

[57]  Emma ter Mors,et al.  It's not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht , 2012 .

[58]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life , 2010 .

[59]  Sebastiaan Deetman,et al.  Regional differences in mitigation strategies: an example for passenger transport , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[60]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transition policy: an example from the traffic and transport domain , 2002 .

[61]  G. Spaargaren,et al.  Food Practices in Transition - Changing Food Consumption, Retail and Production in the Age of Reflexive Modernity , 2012 .

[62]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[63]  N. Röling,et al.  Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning , 2007 .

[64]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology , 2012 .

[65]  Nils Markusson,et al.  The social and political complexities of learning in carbon capture and storage demonstration projects , 2011 .

[66]  L. Carvalho,et al.  Green Urban Transport Policies and Cleantech Innovations: Evidence from Curitiba, Göteborg and Hamburg , 2012 .

[67]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden , 2008 .

[68]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 2008 .

[69]  J. Köhler.  Globalization and Sustainable Development: Case Study on International Transport and Sustainable Development , 2014 .

[70]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A transitions model for sustainable mobility , 2009 .

[71]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  Dealing With Complexity and Extreme Events Using a Bottom-Up, Resource-Based Vulnerability Perspective , 2013 .

[72]  M. Kerkhof,et al.  Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations , 2005 .

[73]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  The Contribution of Local Experiments and Negotiation Processes to Field-Level Learning in Emerging (Niche) Technologies , 2008 .

[74]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Technology Options for Low Stabilization Pathways with MERGE , 2010 .

[75]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[76]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[77]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[78]  Peter J. Larkham,et al.  The rise of the ‘food charter’: A mechanism to increase urban agriculture , 2014 .

[79]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The destabilisation of existing regimes: Confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913-1967) , 2013 .

[80]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Making or breaking climate targets: : The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy , 2015 .

[81]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Green States and Social Movements , 2003 .

[82]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[83]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Low Stabilization Scenarios and Implications for Major World Regions from an Integrated Assessment Perspective , 2010 .

[84]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Linking a storyline with multiple models: A cross-scale study of the UK power system transition , 2014 .

[85]  I. Fazey,et al.  Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response , 2014 .

[86]  K. Calvin,et al.  Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models , 2015 .

[87]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy , 2005 .

[88]  Georg Holtz,et al.  Modelling transitions: An appraisal of experiences and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[89]  Claes Andersson,et al.  Societal systems – Complex or worse? , 2014 .

[90]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Mediating Low-Carbon Urban Transitions? Forms of Organization, Knowledge and Action , 2012 .

[91]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Beyond Cockpit-ism: Four Insights to Enhance the Transformative Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals , 2015 .

[92]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model , 2015 .

[93]  Sheri Berman.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2007, Perspectives on Politics.

[94]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[95]  Sabine Hielscher,et al.  A grassroots sustainable energy niche?:Reflections on community energy in the UK , 2014 .

[96]  Hans-Martin Füssel,et al.  How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: A comprehensive indicator-based assessment , 2010 .

[97]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Socio-Technological Regimes and Transition Contexts , 2004 .

[98]  N. V. Beeck.  Classification of Energy Models , 1999 .

[99]  Pim Martens,et al.  The Dual Challenge of Sustainability Transitions , 2011 .

[100]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  The missing link: Bringing institutions and politics into energy future studies , 2011 .

[101]  Gerardo Marletto,et al.  Car and the city: Socio-technical transition pathways to 2030 , 2014 .

[102]  G. Kramer,et al.  A multi-level perspective on the introduction of hydrogen and battery-electric vehicles , 2010 .

[103]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[104]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  The Electrification of Automobility. The bumpy ride of electric vehicles towards regime transition , 2012 .

[105]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[106]  John P. Weyant,et al.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.

[107]  G. P. Hammond,et al.  Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA).