The need for integrated clinical and administrative data models for risk adjustment in assessment of the cost transplant care

Value‐based purchasing requires accurate techniques to appropriately measure both outcomes and cost with robust adjustment for differences in severity of illness. Traditional methods to adjust cost estimates have exclusively used administrative data derived from billing claims to identify comorbidity and complications. Transplantation uniquely has accurate national clinical registry data that can be used to supplement administrative data.

[1]  A. Israni,et al.  OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Liver , 2022, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[2]  W. Kim,et al.  MELD 3.0: The Model for End-stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era. , 2021, Gastroenterology.

[3]  A. Israni,et al.  OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Liver , 2021, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[4]  M. Schnitzler,et al.  A simple risk‐based reimbursement system for kidney transplant , 2020, Clinical transplantation.

[5]  N. Graves,et al.  Deceased donor kidney allocation: an economic evaluation of contemporary longevity matching practices , 2020, BMC Health Services Research.

[6]  J. Schold,et al.  Time for reform in transplant program–specific reporting: AST/ASTS transplant metrics taskforce , 2019, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[7]  E. Orav,et al.  Association of Practice-Level Social and Medical Risk With Performance in the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program , 2017, JAMA.

[8]  D. McLaughlin MACRA: An Overview and Implications. Healthcare is taking the next step on the long road to value-based purchasing. , 2017, Healthcare executive.

[9]  E. Teisberg,et al.  Value‐based care in hepatology , 2017, Hepatology.

[10]  M. Schnitzler,et al.  The Changing Financial Landscape of Renal Transplant Practice: A National Cohort Analysis , 2017, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[11]  D. Segev,et al.  Waitlist Outcomes of Liver Transplant Candidates Who Were Reprioritized Under Share 35 , 2017, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[12]  M. Porter,et al.  Standardizing Patient Outcomes Measurement. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. Brook,et al.  Using Both Clinical Registry and Administrative Claims Data to Measure Risk-adjusted Surgical Outcomes. , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[14]  Christine A. Sinsky,et al.  From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider , 2014, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[15]  A. Israni,et al.  Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States. , 2013, Transplantation reviews.

[16]  M. Volk,et al.  Variation in Organ Quality between Liver Transplant Centers , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[17]  P. Barnett An Improved Set of Standards for Finding Cost for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2009, Medical care.

[18]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Case Mix, Quality and High‐Cost Kidney Transplant Patients , 2009, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[19]  P. Neumann,et al.  MEASURING COSTS IN COST-UTILITY ANALYSES , 2000, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.