Effects of Race on Responses and Response Latencies in the Weapon Identification Task: A Test of Six Models

The authors consider six models of underlying process in the weapon identification task: The first two are response-time extensions of signal detection models; the last four, of the process dissociation model. Predictions for accuracy data, correct response latencies, and false response latencies are used to discriminate between models. In the present study, racial bias in responses and correct response latency was replicated. New findings were that the direction of bias was reversed in error latency and that errors were faster than correct responses. These findings rule out four models, in particular, the idea that race biases early perception and interpretation of targets. Implications for reducing errors in the weapon identification task and possibilities of discriminating between the remaining two models are discussed.

[1]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[2]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Mental control and visual illusions : Toward explaining race-biased weapon misidentifications q , 2004 .

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Conceptualizing control in social cognition: how executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Judd,et al.  Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Jonathan Evans On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning , 2007 .

[7]  A. Voss,et al.  Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[8]  R. Audley,et al.  The relation between decision time and relative response frequency in a blue-green discrimination. , 1968, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[9]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  O. Govorun,et al.  Ego—Depletion and Prejudice: Separating Automatic and Controlled Components , 2006 .

[11]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Neural Signals for the Detection of Unintentional Race Bias , 2004, Psychological science.

[12]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons , 2002 .

[13]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs external cues. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[14]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Targets of discrimination: Effects of race on responses to weapons holders , 2003 .

[15]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Individual Differences in the Regulation of Intergroup Bias: The Role of Conflict Monitoring and Neural Signals for Control , 2007 .

[16]  R. Audley,et al.  SOME ALTERNATIVE STOCHASTIC MODELS OF CHOICE1 , 1965 .

[17]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  R. Ratcliff Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[19]  David Clark-Carter,et al.  Quantitative psychological research : a student's handbook , 2004 .

[20]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[22]  D. Vickers,et al.  Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[24]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[25]  C. Judd,et al.  The police officer's dilemma: using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[27]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .