A Big Data Methodology for Bridging Quantitative and Qualitative Political Science Research

The spread of digital technologies has led to a massively interconnected global system that creates and transmits astronomical quantities of data. This “information explosion” impacts the ways we can study and understand the dynamics of socio-political systems by increasing the variety, availability, and complexity of the data available to both qualitative and quantitative political scientists. These new information sources can, importantly, also support mixed methods approaches that can be more effective than either pure approach. However, researchers currently lack the appropriate tools to fully leverage this wealth of information. In this paper, we present a new technology-based methodological framework — the Model Analyst’s Toolkit (MAT) — that can support mixed methods research designs. As a use case, we focus on the particularly challenging analytic task of establishing causal models and illustrate how this methodological approach can enable experts of all backgrounds to use data visualization, modeling, and validation tools to enhance their findings in the evolving digital information environment.

[1]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[2]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  The Limitations of Net-Effects Thinking , 2006 .

[3]  C. Myers,et al.  A level building dynamic time warping algorithm for connected word recognition , 1981 .

[4]  J. Goldthorpe Causation, statistics, and sociology , 1998 .

[5]  Gary Goertz,et al.  A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2006, Political Analysis.

[6]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology , 2006, Political Analysis.

[7]  George Sugihara,et al.  Detecting Causality in Complex Ecosystems , 2012, Science.

[8]  C. Granger Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[9]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Causal Process “Observation”: Oxymoron or (Fine) Old Wine , 2010, Political Analysis.

[10]  David Collier,et al.  Outdated Views of Qualitative Methods: Time to Move On , 2010, Political Analysis.

[11]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  Generalized feature extraction for structural pattern recognition in time-series data , 2001 .

[12]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[13]  J. Mahoney Nominal, Ordinal, and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Philip Chan,et al.  Toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space , 2007, Intell. Data Anal..

[15]  Avi Pfeffer,et al.  A Metamodel Description Language for HSCB Modeling , 2010 .

[16]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[17]  James Mahoney,et al.  A tale of two cultures: qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences and Social science concepts: a user's guide and Explaining war and peace: case studies and necessary condition counterfactuals and Case studies, causal mechanisms, and selecting cases , 2015 .

[18]  John R. Freeman Granger Causality and the Time Series Analysis of Political Relationships , 1983 .

[19]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[20]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  “Is 28% Good or Bad?” Evaluability and Preference Reversals in Health Care Decisions , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[21]  T. McKeown Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research , 1999, International Organization.

[22]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  A matter of perspective , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[24]  Philip A. Schrodt Beyond the Linear Frequentist Orthodoxy , 2006, Political Analysis.

[25]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[26]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[27]  Gerardo L. Munck Canons of research design in qualitative analysis , 1998 .