Design Principles as a Guide for Constraint Based and Dynamic Modeling: Towards an Integrative Workflow

During the last 10 years, systems biology has matured from a fuzzy concept combining omics, mathematical modeling and computers into a scientific field on its own right. In spite of its incredible potential, the multilevel complexity of its objects of study makes it very difficult to establish a reliable connection between data and models. The great number of degrees of freedom often results in situations, where many different models can explain/fit all available datasets. This has resulted in a shift of paradigm from the initially dominant, maybe naive, idea of inferring the system out of a number of datasets to the application of different techniques that reduce the degrees of freedom before any data set is analyzed. There is a wide variety of techniques available, each of them can contribute a piece of the puzzle and include different kinds of experimental information. But the challenge that remains is their meaningful integration. Here we show some theoretical results that enable some of the main modeling approaches to be applied sequentially in a complementary manner, and how this workflow can benefit from evolutionary reasoning to keep the complexity of the problem in check. As a proof of concept, we show how the synergies between these modeling techniques can provide insight into some well studied problems: Ammonia assimilation in bacteria and an unbranched linear pathway with end-product inhibition.

[1]  A. Szabó,et al.  Diffusion-controlled bimolecular reaction rates. The effect of rotational diffusion and orientation constraints. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Prodromos Daoutidis,et al.  Non-linear reduction for kinetic models of metabolic reaction networks. , 2004, Metabolic engineering.

[3]  C. Mathews Thermodynamics of biochemical reactions , 2004 .

[4]  B. Palsson,et al.  Metabolic capabilities of Escherichia coli: I. synthesis of biosynthetic precursors and cofactors. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  U. Sauer,et al.  Advancing metabolic models with kinetic information. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[6]  O Shoval,et al.  Evolutionary Trade-Offs, Pareto Optimality, and the Geometry of Phenotype Space , 2012, Science.

[7]  H. Qian,et al.  Relationship between Thermodynamic Driving Force and One-Way Fluxes in Reversible Processes , 2006, PloS one.

[8]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[9]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  An integrated open framework for thermodynamics of reactions that combines accuracy and coverage , 2012, Bioinform..

[10]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[11]  K. Chou,et al.  A semi-analytical expression for the concentration distribution of substrate molecules in fast, enzyme-catalysed reaction systems. , 1981, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  M. Karplus,et al.  How Enzymes Work: Analysis by Modern Rate Theory and Computer Simulations , 2004, Science.

[13]  D. Fell,et al.  Is maximization of molar yield in metabolic networks favoured by evolution? , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  K. Powell,et al.  Improved conversion of methanol to single-cell protein by Methylophilus methylotrophus , 1980, Nature.

[15]  M. Savageau Biochemical Systems Analysis: A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology , 1976 .

[16]  R. Milo,et al.  Glycolytic strategy as a tradeoff between energy yield and protein cost , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  B. Palsson,et al.  Elimination of thermodynamically infeasible loops in steady-state metabolic models. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[19]  A. Fersht,et al.  Catalysis, binding and enzyme-substrate complementarity , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  Nesa L'abbe Wu,et al.  Linear programming and extensions , 1981 .

[21]  Yang Liu,et al.  Parameter estimation of dynamic biological network models using integrated fluxes , 2014, BMC Systems Biology.

[22]  H G Crabtree,et al.  Observations on the carbohydrate metabolism of tumours. , 1929, The Biochemical journal.

[23]  J J Burbaum,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of the catalytic effectiveness of an enzyme. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[24]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[25]  G Pettersson,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of the catalytic efficiency of enzymes. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[26]  Naresh K. Sinha,et al.  Modern Control Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[27]  U. von Stockar,et al.  How reliable are thermodynamic feasibility statements of biochemical pathways? , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  R Heinrich,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of enzyme kinetic parameters; effect of constraints. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  R. Milo,et al.  Central carbon metabolism as a minimal biochemical walk between precursors for biomass and energy. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[30]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  ESTIMATION OF UPPER BOUNDS FOR THE RATES OF ENZYMATIC REACTIONS , 1990 .

[31]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Biochemical Systems Theory: A Review , 2013 .

[32]  K. Valgepea,et al.  Comparison and applications of label-free absolute proteome quantification methods on Escherichia coli. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[33]  J. Rabinowitz,et al.  Absolute Metabolite Concentrations and Implied Enzyme Active Site Occupancy in Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[34]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  Gobal optimization of hybrid kinetic/FBA models via outer-approximation , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[35]  Rui Alves,et al.  Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons , 2000, Bioinform..

[36]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[37]  B. Palsson,et al.  Flux-concentration duality in dynamic nonequilibrium biological networks. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Wolfram Liebermeister,et al.  Pathway Thermodynamics Highlights Kinetic Obstacles in Central Metabolism , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Ron Milo,et al.  eQuilibrator—the biochemical thermodynamics calculator , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  System estimation from metabolic time-series data , 2008, Bioinform..

[41]  Hans V. Westerhoff,et al.  Nitrogen Assimilation in Escherichia coli: Putting Molecular Data into a Systems Perspective , 2013, Microbiology and Molecular Reviews.

[42]  Leen Stougie,et al.  Optimal flux spaces of genome-scale stoichiometric models are determined by a few subnetworks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[43]  G. Hammes Multiple conformational changes in enzyme catalysis. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[44]  B. Palsson,et al.  Metabolic Capabilities of Escherichia coli II. Optimal Growth Patterns , 1993 .

[45]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. III. Dynamic solutions using a power-law approximation , 1970 .

[46]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Systems Biology , 1994 .

[47]  F. Montero,et al.  Optimization of Metabolism: The Evolution of Metabolic Pathways Toward Simplicity Through the Game of the Pentose Phosphate Cycle , 1994 .

[48]  A. Sorribas,et al.  Cooperativity and saturation in biochemical networks: A saturable formalism using Taylor series approximations , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[49]  V. Hatzimanikatis,et al.  Thermodynamics-based metabolic flux analysis. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[50]  Rui Alves,et al.  Systemic properties of ensembles of metabolic networks: application of graphical and statistical methods to simple unbranched pathways , 2000, Bioinform..

[51]  E. Meléndez-Hevia,et al.  The game of the pentose phosphate cycle. , 1985, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  Alberto Marin-Sanguino,et al.  Flux duality in nonlinear GMA systems: implications for metabolic engineering. , 2010, Journal of biotechnology.

[53]  A. Warshel Electrostatic Origin of the Catalytic Power of Enzymes and the Role of Preorganized Active Sites* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[55]  Evangelos Simeonidis,et al.  Flux balance analysis: a geometric perspective. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[56]  M A Savageau,et al.  Irreversibility in unbranched pathways: preferred positions based on regulatory considerations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[57]  E. Gilles,et al.  Thermodynamically feasible kinetic models of reaction networks. , 2007, Biophysical journal.