We present NNR-NUVEL1, a model of plate velocities relative to the unique reference frame defined by requiring no-net-rotation of the lithosphere while constraining relative plate velocities to equal those in global plate motion model NUVEL-1 [DeMets et al., 1990]. Differences between NNR-NUVEL1 and no-net-rotation plate motion model AM0-2 [Minster and Jordan, 1978] are as large as 15 mm/yr. In NNR-NUVEL1, the Pacific plate rotates in a right-handed sense relative to the no-net-rotation reference frame at 0.67°/m.y. about 63°S, 107°E. This rotation nearly parallels, but is 32% slower than, the Pacific-hotspot Euler vector of HS2-NUVEL1, which is a global model of plate-hotspot velocities constrained to consistency with NUVEL-1 [Gripp and Gordon, 1990]. At Hawaii the Pacific plate moves relative to the no-net-rotation reference frame at 70 mm/yr, which is 25 mm/yr slower than the Pacific plate moves relative to the hotspots. Differences between NNR-NUVEL1 and HS2-NUVEL1 are described completely by a right-handed rotation of 0.33°/m.y. about 49°S, 65°E. The 99% confidence ellipsoids for plate-hotspot motion in model HS2-NUVEL1 exclude the corresponding Euler vectors from model NNR-NUVELl. Thus the no-net-rotation reference frame differs significantly from the hotspot reference frame. If the difference between reference frames is caused by motion of the hotspots relative to a mean mantle reference frame, then hotspots beneath the Pacific plate move with coherent motion towards the east-southeast. Alternatively, the difference between reference frames may show that the uniform drag, no-net-torque reference frame, which is kinematically equivalent to the no-net-rotation reference frame, is based on a dynamically incorrect premise. Possible exceptions to the assumption of uniform drag include a net torque on the lithosphere due to attached subducting slabs and greater resistance to plate motion beneath continents than beneath oceans.
[1]
Richard G. Gordon,et al.
Current plate motions
,
1990
.
[2]
David E. Smith,et al.
Tectonic motion and deformation from satellite laser ranging to LAGEOS
,
1990
.
[3]
Allan Cox,et al.
Relative Motions Between Oceanic and Continental Plates in the Pacific Basin
,
1986
.
[4]
P. Molnar,et al.
Relative motions of hotspots in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans since late Cretaceous time
,
1987,
Nature.
[5]
R. Gordon,et al.
Cenozoic Global Plate Motions
,
1986
.
[6]
C. G. Chase.
Asthenospheric counterflow: a kinematic model
,
1979
.
[7]
C. G. Chase.
Plate kinematics: The Americas, East Africa, and the rest of the world
,
1978
.
[8]
Thomas H. Jordan,et al.
Present‐day plate motions
,
1977
.
[9]
J. Harper.
Mantle flow and plate motions
,
1986
.
[10]
C. Doglioni,et al.
Differential Rotation Between Lithosphere and Mantle' A Consequence of Lateral Mantle Viscosity Variations
,
1991
.
[11]
R. Gordon,et al.
Current plate velocities relative to the hotspots incorporating the NUVEL-1 global plate motion model
,
1990
.
[12]
B. Tapley,et al.
Project MERIT standards.
,
1983
.
[13]
S. Solomon,et al.
Some simple physical models for absolute plate motions
,
1974
.
[14]
C. G. Chase.
The N Plate Problem of Plate Tectonics
,
1972
.