Machine learning in control of functional electrical stimulation systems for locomotion

Two machine learning techniques were evaluated for automatic design of a rule-based control of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for locomotion of spinal cord injured humans. The task was to learn the invariant characteristics of the relationship between sensory information and the FES-control signal by using off-line supervised training. Sensory signals were recorded using pressure sensors installed in the insoles of a subject's shoes and goniometers attached across the joints of the affected leg. The FES-control consisted of pulses corresponding to time intervals when the subject pressed on the manual push-button to deliver the stimulation during FES-assisted ambulation. The machine learning techniques used were the adaptive logic network (ALN) and the inductive learning algorithm (IL). Results to date suggest that, given the same training data, the IL learned faster than the ALN while both performed the test rapidly. The generalization was estimated by measuring the test errors and it was better with an ALN, especially if past points were used to reflect the time dimension. Both techniques were able to predict future stimulation events. An advantage of the ALN over the IL was that ALN's can be retrained with new data without losing previously collected knowledge. The advantages of the IL over the ALN were that the IL produces small, explicit, comprehensible trees and that the relative importance of each sensory contribution can be quantified.<<ETX>>

[1]  W. W. Armstrong,et al.  Properties of boolean functions with a tree decomposition , 1974 .

[2]  Jan Gecsei,et al.  Adaptation Algorithms for Binary Tree Networks , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  I. K. Sethi,et al.  Hierarchical Classifier Design Using Mutual Information , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  E. Marsolais,et al.  Functional walking in paralyzed patients by means of electrical stimulation. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  J S Petrofsky,et al.  Closed-loop control of movement of skeletal muscle. , 1985, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[6]  R. E. Barr,et al.  Design and implementation of digital filters for biomedical signal processing , 1986 .

[7]  J P Paul,et al.  Hybrid FES orthosis incorporating closed loop control and sensory feedback. , 1988, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[8]  Brian J. Andrews,et al.  Ruled-based control of a hybrid FES orthosis for assisting paraplegic locomotion , 1989 .

[9]  C. A. Kirkwood,et al.  Finite state control of FES systems: application of AI inductive learning techniques , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[10]  L. Schwirtlich,et al.  Hybrid assistive system-the motor neuroprosthesis , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  C. A. Kirkwood,et al.  Automatic detection of gait events: a case study using inductive learning techniques. , 1989, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[12]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  Paraplegic standing controlled by functional neuromuscular stimulation. I. Computer model and control-system design , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  D. Smith,et al.  A random walk in Hamming space , 1990, 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[14]  Dejan B. Popovic,et al.  Control Aspects of Active Above-Knee Prosthesis , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[15]  Dekang Lin,et al.  LEARNING AND GENERALIZATION IN ADAPTIVE LOGIC NETWORKS *1This research has been partially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under operating grant OGP-5714. , 1991 .

[16]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .

[17]  B. Heller The production and control of functional electrical stimulation swing-through gait , 1992 .

[18]  William W. Armstrong,et al.  Evaluation of Adaptive Logic Networks for control of walking in paralyzed patients , 1992, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Comparison of natural and artificial control of movement , 1993 .

[20]  Dejan B. Popovic,et al.  Learning of EMG-patterns by adaptive logic networks , 1993, Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Societ.

[21]  Raymond J. Mooney,et al.  Symbolic and Neural Learning Algorithms: An Experimental Comparison , 1991, Machine Learning.