Association between Drug Insurance Cost Sharing Strategies and Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review

Background Prescription drugs are used in people with hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease to manage their illness. Patient cost sharing strategies such as copayments and deductibles are often employed to lower expenditures for prescription drug insurance plans, but the impact on health outcomes in these patients is unclear. Objective To determine the association between drug insurance and patient cost sharing strategies on medication adherence, clinical and economic outcomes in those with chronic diseases (defined herein as diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular disease). Methods Studies were included if they examined various cost sharing strategies including copayments, coinsurance, fixed copayments, deductibles and maximum out-of-pocket expenditures. Value-based insurance design and reference based pricing studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently identified original intervention studies (randomized controlled trials, interrupted time series, and controlled before-after designs). MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and relevant reference lists were searched until March 2013. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, quality, and extracted data. Eleven studies, assessing the impact of seven policy changes, were included: 2 separate reports of one randomized controlled trial, 4 interrupted time series, and 5 controlled before-after studies. Findings Outcomes included medication adherence, clinical events (myocardial infarction, stroke, death), quality of life, healthcare utilization, or cost. The heterogeneity among the studies precluded meta-analysis. Few studies reported the impact of cost sharing strategies on mortality, clinical and economic outcomes. The association between patient copayments and medication adherence varied across studies, ranging from no difference to significantly lower adherence, depending on the amount of the copayment. Conclusion Lowering cost sharing in patients with chronic diseases may improve adherence, but the impact on clinical and economic outcomes is uncertain.

[1]  G. Bakris,et al.  Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Shuen-Zen Liu,et al.  Changes in drug utilization following the outpatient prescription drug cost-sharing program--evidence from Taiwan's elderly. , 2004, Health policy.

[3]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). , 2001, JAMA.

[4]  S. Schneeweiss,et al.  Adherence to Statin Therapy Under Drug Cost Sharing in Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Natural Experiment , 2007, Circulation.

[5]  L. Pilote,et al.  The effects of cost-sharing on essential drug prescriptions, utilization of medical care and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  Kathryn A Phillips,et al.  Potential Savings from Substituting Generic Drugs for Brand-Name Drugs: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 19972000 , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  R. Goetzel,et al.  The effects of prescription drug cost sharing: a review of the evidence. , 2005, The American journal of managed care.

[8]  T. Wagner,et al.  Cost-related medication underuse among chronically ill adults: the treatments people forgo, how often, and who is at risk. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[9]  Philip McFarlane,et al.  Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[10]  Y. Zhang,et al.  The effect of Medicare Part D on drug and medical spending. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  The Causal Effect of Health Insurance on Utilization and Outcomes in Adults: A Systematic Review of US Studies , 2008, Medical care.

[12]  S. Kimmel,et al.  Impact of a Prescription Copayment Increase on Lipid-Lowering Medication Adherence in Veterans , 2009, Circulation.

[13]  A. Oxman,et al.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug use. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  G. Cuckler,et al.  National health expenditure projections: modest annual growth until coverage expands and economic growth accelerates. , 2012, Health affairs.

[15]  Andy Wielgosz,et al.  Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care , 2009, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[16]  R. Collins,et al.  The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials , 2012, The Lancet.

[17]  B. Nightengale,et al.  Economic Impact of Cost-Containment Strategies in Third Party Programmes in the US (Part I ) , 1993, PharmacoEconomics.

[18]  W. Ghali,et al.  Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[19]  E. Keeler,et al.  How free care reduced hypertension in the health insurance experiment. , 1985, JAMA.

[20]  S. Schneeweiss,et al.  Adherence to beta-blocker therapy under drug cost-sharing in patients with and without acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, The American journal of managed care.

[21]  Harvey V Fineberg,et al.  Shattuck Lecture. A successful and sustainable health system--how to get there from here. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Dana P Goldman,et al.  Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health. , 2007, JAMA.

[25]  J. Lave,et al.  The impact of Medicare Part D on medication treatment of hypertension. , 2011, Health services research.

[26]  Y. Zhang,et al.  The Impact of Medicare Part D on Medication Adherence Among Older Adults Enrolled in Medicare-Advantage Products , 2010, Medical care.

[27]  N. Shah,et al.  Projecting future drug expenditures--2012. , 2012, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[28]  R. Collins,et al.  The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. , 2012, Lancet.

[29]  E B Keeler,et al.  Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  M. Solomon,et al.  Benefits and the Use of Drugs by the Chronically Ill , 2004 .

[31]  R. Holman,et al.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34) , 1998, The Lancet.

[32]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Enrolment in primary care networks: impact on outcomes and processes of care for patients with diabetes , 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[33]  C. Huttin The use of prescription charges. , 1994, Health policy.

[34]  Effect of the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap on Medication Use Among Patients With Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  B. Davis,et al.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). , 2002, JAMA.

[36]  Dean G. Smith,et al.  Impact of Consumer Fees on Drug Utilisation , 1992, PharmacoEconomics.

[37]  Y. Sharabi,et al.  Hypertension and socioeconomic status , 2008, Current opinion in cardiology.