Test Method to Determine Aggregate/Asphalt Adhesion Properties and Potential Moisture Damage

The aim of this research project was to improve current practice by investigating different test methods to quantify moisture damage in an effort to serve the short and long term needs of the agency and industry. In the short term, more efficient test methods were investigated for use as a screening test to supplement current testing procedures. The Stripping Test was chosen as a candidate to serve this need. This test measures the mass loss due to moisture conditioning of a HMA loose mix. The test was evaluated in terms of serving as a screening test to waive mechanical testing requirements for mixes that display resistance to moisture damage. To serve the long term needs of the agency the use of fracture energy, a fundamental property of the asphalt mixture, was investigated as a first step in identifying a parameter that relates to pavement performance. The research involved selection and testing of common hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixes used in Wisconsin using the stripping test to measure percent mass loss and the indirect tension test to measure tensile strength and fracture energy. Test results were evaluated on an individual basis in their ability to reliably identify moisture damage due to sample conditioning and the effects of the addition of an anti-stripping agent or change in aggregate type or gradation. The results of the mechanical testing were compared to the non-mechanical test results to evaluate the possibility of incorporating a non mechanical screening test into current Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) asphalt mixture testing specifications. Furthermore, the statistical method of analysis of variance was performed on the mechanical testing results to identify significant effects. The quality of the mechanical tests was then determined by evaluating if the significant effects were consistent between the mechanical testing parameters and with common engineering knowledge. The results of this research concluded that the Stripping Test is not adequate for use by WisDOT due to high variability within testing results for a certain mix. The fracture energy test gave promising results however, the high variability and complex test protocol prevent recommendation for the test to be implemented at this time. Recommendations from this research include improvement of the fracture energy test procedure to reduce variability, and further investigation into the physical causes of moisture damage. Specifically asphalt/aggregate adhesion, the effect of the mastic (fine aggregate and binder), and physiochemical interaction between the asphalt binder and aggregate must be understood.

[1]  Reynaldo Roque,et al.  Performance-Based Fracture Criterion for Evaluation of Moisture Susceptibility in Hot-Mix Asphalt , 2004 .

[2]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE EXTENT OF HMA MOISTURE DAMAGE IN WISCONSIN AS IT RELATES TO PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[3]  H Bahia,et al.  EVALUATION AND CORRELATION OF LAB AND FIELD TENSILE STRENGTH RATIO (TSR) PROCEDURES AND VALUES IN ASSESSING THE STRIPPING POTENTIAL OF ASPHALT MIXES , 1999 .

[4]  Peter E. Sebaaly,et al.  Effectiveness of Lime in Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements , 2003 .

[5]  E L Dukatz,et al.  THE EFFECT OF AIR VOIDS ON THE TENSILE STRENGTH RATIO (WITH DISCUSSION) , 1987 .

[6]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FINE AGGREGATE ANGULARITY, ASPHALT CONTENT AND PERFORMANCE GRADED ASPHALTS ON HOT MIX ASPHALT PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[7]  Reynaldo Roque,et al.  DETERMINATION OF CRACK GROWTH RATE PARAMETER OF ASPHALT MIXTURES USING THE SUPERPAVE IDT , 1999 .

[8]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Role of adhesion and thin film tackiness of asphalt binders in moisture damage of HMA , 2003 .

[9]  Yang H. Huang,et al.  Pavement Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[10]  Prithvi S. Kandhal,et al.  Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction , 1996 .

[11]  John T Harvey,et al.  TEST METHODS TO PREDICT MOISTURE SENSITIVITY OF HOT-MIX ASPHALT PAVEMENTS , 2003 .

[12]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Relating Adhesion and Cohesion of Asphalts to the Effect of Moisture on Laboratory Performance of Asphalt Mixtures , 2005 .

[13]  Reynaldo Roque,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Test Methods to Evaluate Water Damage and Effectiveness of Antistripping Agents , 2005 .

[14]  J D'angelo,et al.  MATERIAL PRODUCTION, MIX DESIGN, AND PAVEMENT DESIGN EFFECTS ON MOISTURE DAMAGE , 2003 .

[15]  Da Anderson,et al.  The New Proposed Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binders: Why are they Required and how do they Compare to Conventional Properties , 1995 .

[16]  N P Khosla,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF FINE GRADED SUPERPAVE MIXTURES FOR SURFACE COURSES , 2001 .

[17]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Measurements of Surface Energy and Its Relationship to Moisture Damage , 2005 .