Single-cell analysis of clonal dynamics in direct lineage reprogramming: a combinatorial indexing method for lineage tracing

Single-cell technologies are offering unprecedented insight into complex biology, revealing the behavior of rare cell populations that are typically masked in bulk population analyses. The application of these methodologies to cell fate reprogramming holds particular promise as the manipulation of cell identity is typically inefficient, generating heterogeneous cell populations. One current limitation of single-cell approaches is that lineage relationships are lost as a result of cell processing, restricting interpretations of the data collected. Here, we present a single-cell resolution lineage-tracing approach based on the combinatorial indexing of cells, ‘CellTagging’. Application of this method, in concert with high-throughput single-cell RNA-sequencing, reveals the transcriptional dynamics of direct reprogramming from fibroblasts to induced endoderm progenitors. These analyses demonstrate that while many cells initiate reprogramming, complete silencing of fibroblast identity and transition to a progenitor-like state represents a rare event. Clonal analyses uncover a remarkable degree of heterogeneity arising from individual cells. Overall, very few cells fully reprogram to generate expanded populations with a low degree of clonal diversity. Extended culture of these engineered cells reveals an instability of the reprogrammed state and reversion to a fibroblast-like phenotype. Together, these results demonstrate the utility of our lineage-tracing approach to reveal dynamics of lineage reprogramming, and will be of broad utility in many cell biological applications.

[1]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Direct lineage conversion of terminally differentiated hepatocytes to functional neurons. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[2]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  CellNet: Network Biology Applied to Stem Cell Engineering , 2014, Cell.

[3]  N. Neff,et al.  Dissecting direct reprogramming from fibroblast to neuron using single-cell RNA-seq , 2016, Nature.

[4]  Aaron T. L. Lun,et al.  scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalisation and visualisation of single-cell RNA-seq data in R , 2016 .

[5]  James A. Gagnon,et al.  Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing , 2016, Science.

[6]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis , 2008, Nature.

[7]  J. Goeman,et al.  KeyGenes, a Tool to Probe Tissue Differentiation Using a Human Fetal Transcriptional Atlas , 2015, Stem cell reports.

[8]  D. Melton,et al.  Turning straw into gold: directing cell fate for regenerative medicine , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Hierarchical Mechanisms for Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Neurons , 2013, Cell.

[10]  A. Regev,et al.  Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data , 2015 .

[11]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  Droplet Barcoding for Single-Cell Transcriptomics Applied to Embryonic Stem Cells , 2015, Cell.

[12]  Samantha A. Morris Direct lineage reprogramming via pioneer factors; a detour through developmental gene regulatory networks , 2016, Development.

[13]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Induction of human neuronal cells by defined transcription factors , 2011, Nature.

[14]  V. Vedantham,et al.  Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts into Functional Cardiomyocytes by Defined Factors , 2010, Cell.

[15]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Comprehensive Classification of Retinal Bipolar Neurons by Single-Cell Transcriptomics , 2016, Cell.

[16]  Jeroen S. van Zon,et al.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  A blueprint for engineering cell fate: current technologies to reprogram cell identity , 2013, Cell Research.

[18]  E. Laurenti,et al.  The unfolded protein response governs integrity of the haematopoietic stem-cell pool during stress , 2014, Nature.

[19]  Eliah G. Overbey,et al.  Aligning single-cell developmental and reprogramming trajectories identifies molecular determinants of reprogramming outcome , 2017, bioRxiv.

[20]  L. Hui,et al.  Induction of functional hepatocyte-like cells from mouse fibroblasts by defined factors , 2011, Nature.

[21]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis , 2014, Nature.

[22]  Zachary D. Smith,et al.  Dynamic single-cell imaging of direct reprogramming reveals an early specifying event , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Aaron T. L. Lun,et al.  Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R , 2017, Bioinform..

[24]  Greg Donahue,et al.  Facilitators and Impediments of the Pluripotency Reprogramming Factors' Initial Engagement with the Genome , 2012, Cell.

[25]  関谷 明香,et al.  Direct conversion of mouse fibroblasts to hepatocyte-like cells by defined factors , 2012 .

[26]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  Dissecting Engineered Cell Types and Enhancing Cell Fate Conversion via CellNet , 2014, Cell.

[27]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Highly Parallel Genome-wide Expression Profiling of Individual Cells Using Nanoliter Droplets , 2015, Cell.

[28]  Kevin Eggan,et al.  Conversion of mouse and human fibroblasts into functional spinal motor neurons. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[29]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Aligning Single-Cell Developmental and Reprogramming Trajectories Identifies Molecular Determinants of Myogenic Reprogramming Outcome. , 2018, Cell systems.

[30]  Sarah A Teichmann,et al.  Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome data. , 2015, Methods.

[31]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors , 2010, Nature.

[32]  S. Lipton,et al.  Direct reprogramming of adult human fibroblasts to functional neurons under defined conditions. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[33]  Sandy L. Klemm,et al.  Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase , 2012, Cell.

[34]  T. Graf,et al.  PU.1 and C/EBPα/β convert fibroblasts into macrophage-like cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  S. Balasubramanian,et al.  Retinol and ascorbate drive erasure of epigenetic memory and enhance reprogramming to naïve pluripotency by complementary mechanisms , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  H. Willenbring A simple code for installing hepatocyte function. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[37]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[39]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Myt1l safeguards neuronal identity by actively repressing many non-neuronal fates , 2017, Nature.

[40]  T. Elsdale,et al.  Sexually Mature Individuals of Xenopus laevis from the Transplantation of Single Somatic Nuclei , 1958, Nature.

[41]  Y. Bessho,et al.  The bHLH gene Hes6, an inhibitor of Hes1, promotes neuronal differentiation. , 2000, Development.

[42]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Reference Maps of Human ES and iPS Cell Variation Enable High-Throughput Characterization of Pluripotent Cell Lines , 2011, Cell.

[43]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Direct Lineage Conversions: Unnatural but useful? , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  J. Marioni,et al.  Pooling across cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts , 2016, Genome Biology.