Using Probability for Pathological Complete Response (pCR) as a Decision Support Marker for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients – a Survey Among Physicians
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Lux | M. Beckmann | P. Fasching | L. Häberle | S. Jud | A. Hein | C. Hack | A. Schneeweiss | A. Hartmann | M. Untch | C. Jackisch | C. Thomssen | V. Müller | W. Janni | N. Nabieva | R. Erber | V. Möbus | J. Ettl | D. Lüftner | P. Gass | H. Kolberg
[1] Virginia G Kaklamani,et al. Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21‐Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] T. Hyslop,et al. The impact of chemotherapy sequence on survival in node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma. , 2018 .
[3] Tanja Fehm,et al. BRCA1/2 Mutations and Bevacizumab in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: Response and Prognosis Results in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From the GeparQuinto Study. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[4] M. Bani,et al. BRCA mutations and their influence on pathological complete response and prognosis in a clinical cohort of neoadjuvantly treated breast cancer patients , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[5] M. Lux,et al. Update Breast Cancer 2018 (Part 1) – Primary Breast Cancer and Biomarkers , 2018, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.
[6] J. Cuzick,et al. Comparison of the Performance of 6 Prognostic Signatures for Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2018, JAMA oncology.
[7] P. Fasching,et al. Abstract GS3-05: Survival analysis of the prospectively randomized phase III GeparSepto trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly nab-paclitaxel with solvent-based paclitaxel followed by anthracycline/cyclophosphamide for patients with early breast cancer – GBG69 , 2018 .
[8] Mike Clarke,et al. Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.
[9] M. Lux,et al. Update Breast Cancer 2017 – Implementation of Novel Therapies , 2017, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.
[10] P. Fasching,et al. Germline Mutation Status, Pathological Complete Response, and Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the GeparSixto Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA oncology.
[11] P. Fasching,et al. Initial Treatment of Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus: Spectrum of Opinion of German Specialists at the 15th International St. Gallen Breast Cancer Conference (Vienna 2017). , 2017, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.
[12] M. Rezai,et al. Factors Influencing Decision-Making for or against Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients in the EvAluate-TM Study. , 2016, Breast care.
[13] L. V. van't Veer,et al. 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.
[14] J. Cuzick,et al. Comparison of EndoPredict and EPclin With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy , 2016, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[15] M. Papa,et al. Neo-adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[16] Virginia G Kaklamani,et al. Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.
[17] C. Geyer,et al. Pathological Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[18] Gideon Blumenthal,et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.
[19] Tae Hoon Lee,et al. Ki-67 as a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients , 2014, Journal of breast cancer.
[20] S. Rodenhuis,et al. Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[21] Jack Cuzick,et al. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[22] M. Bani,et al. Shared decision-making in metastatic breast cancer: discrepancy between the expected prolongation of life and treatment efficacy between patients and physicians, and influencing factors , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[23] P. Fasching,et al. Biomarkers in Breast Cancer - An Update. , 2012, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.
[24] M. Bani,et al. Shared decision-making in breast cancer: discrepancy between the treatment efficacy required by patients and by physicians , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[25] S. Cross,et al. PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2 , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.
[26] P. Fasching,et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[27] Peter A Fasching,et al. Ki67, chemotherapy response, and prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment , 2011, BMC Cancer.
[28] J. Cuzick,et al. Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[29] P. Fasching,et al. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[30] M. Hammond,et al. Clinical Notice for American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on ER/PgR and HER2 testing in breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[31] C. Denkert,et al. Effect of neoadjuvant anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy in different biological breast cancer phenotypes: overall results from the GeparTrio study , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[32] R. Gelber,et al. Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009 , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[33] R. Gelber,et al. Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[34] R. Gelber,et al. Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[35] P. Ravdin,et al. Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[37] I. Zuna,et al. In vivo chemosensitivity-adapted preoperative chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the GEPARTRIO pilot study. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.