Profile-oriented programming teaching to non technical students: A case study

Programming education has been one of the most complex tasks in higher education over the years. One of the great difficulties that students face when they start a curricular unit linked to programming is to acquire skills which allow them solving real life problems through the use of algorithms. Such skills require the development of the ability to abstract as well as to apply algorithms development techniques. These difficulties are even greater when students attend to a course that does not have as main objective the programming of computers and their basic education is on non-technological areas. As a result of the difficulty in obtaining these competences, there are high failure and dropout rates in courses related to this study field. In order to solve this problem, we propose a methodology based on VARK questionnaire and students background to define the students' profile and, consequently, define what are the appropriate educational materials and tools. To validate this model, a pilot experiment with students to be divided into two groups was carried out, in the academic year 2015–2016, with the application of the model to one of them. In the end, it was found that the final results obtained in the group where the proposed methodology was applied were superior.

[1]  William B. Borgers DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION. , 1919 .

[2]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[3]  Chet Meyers,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom , 1993 .

[4]  Fernando Moreira,et al.  Profile-oriented algorithms teaching: A proposed methodology , 2015, 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).

[5]  David Fonseca,et al.  Mixed-methods research: a new approach to evaluating the motivation and satisfaction of university students using advanced visual technologies , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[6]  F. Coffield Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review , 2004 .

[7]  Thomas F. Hawk,et al.  Using Learning Style Instruments to Enhance Student Learning , 2007 .

[8]  Neil D. Fleming,et al.  Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection , 1992 .

[9]  David Fonseca,et al.  Technological adaptation of the student to the educational density of the course. A case study: 3D architectural visualization , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Maria João Ferreira,et al.  Profile-oriented algorithms teaching: a proposed methodology to elementary school , 2015 .

[11]  A. Mendes,et al.  Uma proposta para ajudar alunos com dificuldades na aprendizagem inicial de programação de computadores , 2008 .

[12]  Vince Bruno,et al.  Designing a mobile-app-based collaborative learning system , 2012 .

[13]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[14]  D. Remenyi,et al.  Research supervision for supervisors and their students , 2004 .

[15]  Pedro Dias,et al.  Portugol IDE v3.x: A new environment to teach and learn computer programming , 2010, IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference.