Processing of negative morphemes in aphasia: An example of the complexities of the closed class/open class concept

The distinction between open class and closed class items is frequently made in contemporary aphasia literature, but it is not always clear that the users of these terms have a full awareness of the linguistic complexity of the concept. This paper thus begins with an extended discussion of some of these complexities, using adverbs, prepositions, and derivational affixes as examples. The paper then describes an experiment which investigated one area of English where the open/closed distinction is unclear, the area of negation. On a sentence-anagram picture-matching task, 25 aphasic subjects (principally non-fluent) responded significantly more accurately when the word cards that they were given to work with contained a negative prefix, such as un-, than when the word set contained the word not. It is suggested that this somewhat unexpected result may be attributable to the close link between derivational prefixes and the open-class words to which they attach.

[1]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Syntactically and Semantically Based Computations: Processing of Prepositions in Agrammatism , 1982, Cortex.

[2]  Robert H. Brookshire,et al.  Introduction to Neurogenic Communication Disorders , 1991 .

[3]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[4]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Clinical Aspects of Dysphasia , 1981 .

[5]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  Contemporary linguistics: An introduction , 1989 .

[6]  Steven G. Lapointe,et al.  Some issues in the linguistic description of agrammatism , 1983, Cognition.

[7]  R Myerson,et al.  Transformational Grammars of Three Agrammatic Patients , 1972, Language and speech.

[8]  D. Parisi,et al.  Syntactic comprehension in aphasia. , 1970, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[9]  R. Brookshire,et al.  Effects of pictures and picturability on sentence verification by aphasic and nonaphasic subjects. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Prosodic Factors in Grammar-Evidence from Aphasia , 1967 .

[11]  D. Crystal,et al.  语言学和语音学基础词典 = A first dictionary of linguistics and phonetics , 1980 .

[12]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Relationship between auditory comprehension and word frequency in aphasia. , 1961, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.

[13]  D. Bolinger The phrasal verb in English , 1974 .

[14]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  The syntactic characterization of agrammatism , 1984, Cognition.

[15]  A Comparison of Aphasic and Normal Adults in a Sentence-Verification Task , 1977, Cortex.

[16]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[17]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  Quantitative Aspects of Agrammatism in Aphasia , 1974 .

[18]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders , 1972 .

[19]  Charles Carpenter Fries,et al.  Teaching and Learning English as a foreign language , 1967 .

[20]  A. Friederici,et al.  Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study , 1987, Brain and Language.

[21]  A. Friederici Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits: The availability of prepositions , 1982, Brain and Language.

[22]  P. Eling Recognition of derivations in Broca's aphasics , 1986, Brain and Language.

[23]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Syntactic loss versus processing deficit: An assessment of two theories of agrammatism and syntactic comprehension deficits , 1989, Cognition.

[24]  M. A. Naeser,et al.  Auditory Syntactic Comprehension in Nine Aphasia Groups (With CT Scans) And Children: Differences in Degree But Not Order of Difficulty Observed , 1987, Cortex.

[25]  Myrna F Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism II. Production , 1980, Brain and Language.