Measuring Information Coupling between the Solar Wind and the Magnetosphere–Ionosphere System

The interaction between the solar wind and the Earth’s magnetosphere–ionosphere system is very complex, being essentially the result of the interplay between an external driver, the solar wind, and internal processes to the magnetosphere–ionosphere system. In this framework, modelling the Earth’s magnetosphere–ionosphere response to the changes of the solar wind conditions requires a correct identification of the causality relations between the different parameters/quantities used to monitor this coupling. Nowadays, in the framework of complex dynamical systems, both linear statistical tools and Granger causality models drastically fail to detect causal relationships between time series. Conversely, information theory-based concepts can provide powerful model-free statistical quantities capable of disentangling the complex nature of the causal relationships. In this work, we discuss how to deal with the problem of measuring causal information in the solar wind–magnetosphere–ionosphere system. We show that a time delay of about 30–60 min is found between solar wind and magnetospheric and ionospheric overall dynamics as monitored by geomagnetic indices, with a great information transfer observed between the z component of the interplanetary magnetic field and geomagnetic indices, while a lower transfer is found when other solar wind parameters are considered. This suggests that the best candidate for modelling the geomagnetic response to solar wind changes is the interplanetary magnetic field component Bz. A discussion of the relevance of our results in the framework of Space Weather is also provided.

[1]  Georgios Balasis,et al.  Common solar wind drivers behind magnetic storm–magnetospheric substorm dependency , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[2]  T. Moretto,et al.  Coordinated observations demonstrating external substorm triggering , 1997 .

[3]  W. I. Axford,et al.  Auroral Ionospheric Ion Feeding of the Inner Plasma Sheet during Substorms , 1996 .

[4]  David Boteler,et al.  The effects of geomagnetic disturbances on electrical systems at the earth's surface , 1998 .

[5]  Vincenzo Carbone,et al.  Timescale separation in the solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling during St. Patrick's Day storms in 2013 and 2015 , 2017 .

[6]  Massimo Materassi,et al.  An information theory approach to the storm-substorm relationship , 2011 .

[7]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[8]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[9]  M. Paluš,et al.  Directionality of coupling from bivariate time series: how to avoid false causalities and missed connections. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  The organized nonlinear dynamics of the magnetosphere , 1996 .

[11]  Toshihiko Iyemori,et al.  Storm-Time Magnetospheric Currents Inferred from Mid-Latitude Geomagnetic Field Variations , 1990 .

[12]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  The terrestrial ring current: Origin, formation, and decay , 1999 .

[13]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  E. Cliver,et al.  The 1859 Solar–Terrestrial Disturbance And the Current Limits of Extreme Space Weather Activity , 2004 .

[15]  V. L. Patel,et al.  A study of geomagnetic storms , 1975 .

[16]  Massimo Materassi,et al.  Predictive Space Weather: An information theory approach , 2011 .

[17]  Milan Paluš,et al.  Causality, dynamical systems and the arrow of time. , 2018, Chaos.

[18]  S. Wing,et al.  External versus internal triggering of substorms: An information‐theoretical approach , 2014 .

[19]  Alexander Kraskov,et al.  Published under the scientific responsability of the EUROPEAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Incorporating , 2002 .

[20]  Donald V. Reames,et al.  Particle acceleration at the Sun and in the heliosphere , 2013 .

[21]  Bruce T. Tsurutani,et al.  Interplanetary origin of geomagnetic storms , 1999 .

[22]  Giuseppe Consolini,et al.  SELF-ORGANIZED CRITICALITY: A NEW PARADIGM FOR THE MAGNETOTAIL DYNAMICS , 2002 .

[23]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Recurrence networks—a novel paradigm for nonlinear time series analysis , 2009, 0908.3447.

[24]  R. Schwenn Space Weather: The Solar Perspective , 2006 .

[25]  Viola Priesemann,et al.  Measuring Information-Transfer Delays , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Surrogate time series , 1999, chao-dyn/9909037.

[27]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[28]  G. Consolini,et al.  On fast and slow Earth’s magnetospheric dynamics during geomagnetic storms: a stochastic Langevin approach , 2018 .

[29]  I. Daglis Terrestrial agents in the realm of space storms: Missions study oxygen ions , 1997 .

[30]  Edward J. Smith,et al.  The nonlinear response of AE to the IMF BS driver: A spectral break at 5 hours , 1990 .

[31]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[32]  S.-I. Akasofu,et al.  Several `Controversial' Issues on Substorms , 2004 .

[33]  I. Coco,et al.  A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Geomagnetically Induced Currents over the Italian Territory , 2019, Space Weather.

[34]  M. L. Kaiser,et al.  Near‐Sun and near‐Earth manifestations of solar eruptions , 2001 .

[35]  G. Consolini,et al.  Geomagnetic D st index forecast based on IMF data only , 2006 .

[36]  Milan Paluš,et al.  Time scales of the European surface air temperature variability: The role of the 7–8 year cycle , 2016 .

[37]  E. Cliver,et al.  A Short-term ESPERTA-based Forecast Tool for Moderate-to-extreme Solar Proton Events , 2018 .

[38]  J. Kappenman,et al.  Effects of Space Weather on Technology Infrastructure , 2004 .

[39]  Enrico Camporeale,et al.  Information theoretical approach to discovering solar wind drivers of the outer radiation belt , 2016 .

[40]  G. Consolini,et al.  Thermodynamics of rare events and impulsive relaxation events in the magnetospheric substorm dynamics , 2007 .

[41]  G. Consolini,et al.  On the Forecast Horizon of Magnetospheric Dynamics: A Scale‐to‐Scale Approach , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[42]  Damien Chua,et al.  Scale‐free statistics of spatiotemporal auroral emissions as depicted by POLAR UVI images: Dynamic magnetosphere is an avalanching system , 2002 .

[43]  Masahisa Sugiura,et al.  Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations. , 1966 .