Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox

The importance of geographical proximity for interaction and knowledge sharing has been discussed extensively in economic geography in recent years. There is increasing consensus that it is just one out of many types of proximities that might be relevant. We argue that proximity may be a crucial driver for agents to connect and exchange knowledge, but too much proximity between these agents on any of the dimensions might harm their innovative performance at the same time. In a study on knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry, we test this so-called proximity paradox empirically. We find evidence that the proximity paradox holds to some degree. Our study clearly shows that cognitive, social and geographical proximity are crucial for explaining the knowledge network of the Dutch aviation industry. But while it takes cognitive, social and geographical proximity to exchange knowledge, we found evidence that proximity lowers firms's innovative performance, but only in the cognitive dimension.

[1]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[2]  Raphaël Suire,et al.  How do Clusters/Pipelines and Core/Periphery Structures Work Together in Knowledge Processes? , 2010 .

[3]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[4]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[5]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[6]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[7]  Majlinda Zhegu,et al.  Aerospace Clusters: Local or Global Knowledge Spillovers? , 2005 .

[8]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity , 2008 .

[9]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[10]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[11]  A. Weterings,et al.  The effect of regional differences on the performance of software firms in the Netherlands , 2005 .

[12]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy , 2007 .

[13]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Technological proximity and the choice of cooperation partner , 2007 .

[14]  Holger Graf,et al.  Gatekeepers in Regional Networks of Innovators , 2007 .

[15]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity , 2007 .

[16]  Charlie Karlsson,et al.  Interregional Inventor Networks as Studied by Patent Co-inventorships , 2006 .

[17]  David Krackardt,et al.  QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness , 1987 .

[18]  Yannick Lung,et al.  Innovation and Proximity , 1999 .

[19]  Andrea Morrison,et al.  Gatekeepers of Knowledge within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How They Interact , 2008 .

[20]  Mia Gray,et al.  Big Firms, Long Arms, Wide Shoulders: The 'Hub-and-Spoke' Industrial District in the Seattle Region , 1996 .

[21]  L. Biggiero,et al.  Heterogeneity and Specificity of Inter-Firm Knowledge Flows in Innovation Networks , 2008 .

[22]  J. J. Berends,et al.  The fibres that hold an innovation network: An analysis of knowledge sharing in the Glare network , 2008 .

[23]  P. Oinas,et al.  Proximity, External Relations, and Local Economic Development , 2005 .

[24]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[25]  Michael Taylor,et al.  The handbook of evolutionary economic geography , 2011 .

[26]  Roger Th. A. J. Leenders,et al.  Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[27]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[28]  M. Castells.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[29]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[30]  Lorenzo Cassi,et al.  Research Collaboration in Co-inventor Networks: Combining Closure, Bridging and Proximities , 2015 .

[31]  Tom Broekel,et al.  The Regional Dimension of Knowledge Transfers—A Behavioral Approach , 2007 .

[32]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[33]  Tom Broekel,et al.  The Bright and Dark Side of Cooperation for Regional Innovation Performance , 2008 .

[34]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Caroline Sabin,et al.  Medical Statistics at a Glance , 2000 .

[36]  D. Stark,et al.  Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism , 1997 .

[37]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[38]  A. T. Wal.  The dynamics of the inventor network in German biotechnology: geographic proximity versus triadic closure , 2014 .

[39]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[40]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Science, Social Networks and Spillovers , 2006 .

[41]  R. Boschma,et al.  The Spatial Evolution of Innovation Networks: A Proximity Perspective , 2010 .

[42]  A. Rallet.  L'économie de proximités , 2002 .

[43]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[44]  T. Brenner,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 10 . 11 An investigation of the relation between cooperation and the innovative success of German regions , 2010 .

[45]  M. Castells.  Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1996 .

[46]  Jérôme Vicente,et al.  Getting into Networks and Clusters: Evidence from the Midi-Pyrenean Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) Collaboration Network , 2011 .

[47]  The determinants of co-inventor tie formation: proximity and network dynamics , 2010 .

[48]  A. Torre,et al.  Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? , 1999 .

[49]  Olof Ejermo.  Patent Diversity as a Predictor of Regional Innovativeness in Sweden , 2003 .

[50]  Arne Isaksen,et al.  Building Regional Innovation Systems: Is Endogenous Industrial Development Possible in the Global Economy? , 2001 .

[51]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[52]  Rolf Sternberg,et al.  The Firm or the Region: What Determines the Innovation Behavior of European Firms? , 2001 .

[53]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[54]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Multicollinearity Robust QAP for Multiple-Regression , 2003 .

[55]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  A. Shaw,et al.  On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics , 2000 .

[57]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[58]  A. Torre,et al.  Which need for geographical proximity in innovation networks at the era of global economy , 1999 .

[59]  Desmond Hickie,et al.  Knowledge and competitiveness in the aerospace industry: The cases of toulouse, seattle and north-west England , 2006 .

[60]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Learning, Technical Change, and Public Policy: How to Create and Exploit Diversity , 2013 .

[61]  Kevin Morgan,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 09 . 18 Spaces of Innovation : learning , proximity and the ecological turn , 2009 .

[62]  Pierre-Alexandre Balland,et al.  Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks: Evidence from R&D projects within the GNSS industry , 2009 .

[63]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[64]  M. Bell,et al.  The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster , 2005 .

[65]  J. E. Ligterink.  Corporate Financial Risk Management , 2001 .

[66]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[67]  B. Kriechel.  Heterogeneity among displaced workers , 2003 .