The toucan beak: Structure and mechanical response

The structure and mechanical response of a Toco toucan (Ramphastos toco) beak were established. The beak was found to be a sandwich composite with an exterior of keratin scales (50 Am diameter and 1 Am thickness) and a core composed of fibrous network of closed-cells made of collagen. The tensile strength of the external shell is about 50 MPa. Micro- and nanoindentation hardness measurements corroborate these values. The keratin shell exhibits a strain-rate sensitive response with a transition from slippage of the scales due to release of the organic glue, at a low strain rate (5 � 10 � 5 s � 1 ) to fracture of the scales at a higher strain rate (1.5 � 10 � 3 s � 1 ). The closed-cell foam consists of fibers having a Young’s modulus (measured by nanoindentation) of 12.7 GPa. This is twice as high as the keratin shells, which have E=6.7 GPa. This is attributed to their higher calcium content. The compressive collapse of the foam was modeled by the Gibson–Ashby constitutive equations. There is a synergistic effect between foam and shell evidenced by a finite-element analysis. The foam stabilizes the deformation of the keratin shell by providing an internal support which increases its buckling load under compressive loading. D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  R. Bonser Hydration sensitivity of ostrich claw keratin , 2002 .

[2]  Marc A. Meyers,et al.  Growth and structure in abalone shell , 2005 .

[3]  R. Bonser,et al.  Young's modulus varies with differential orientation of keratin in feathers. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[4]  Richard K. Traeger,et al.  Physical Properties of Rigid Polyurethane Foams , 1967 .

[5]  R. Bonser,et al.  Indentation Hardness of the Bill Keratin of the European Starling , 1993 .

[6]  K. Johnson,et al.  Indentation of foamed plastics , 1975 .

[7]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[8]  M. Kasapi,et al.  Strain-rate-dependent mechanical properties of the equine hoof wall. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  R. Bonser,et al.  The Young's modulus of feather keratin , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[11]  F. Pautard,et al.  Mineralization of Keratin and its Comparison with the Enamel Matrix , 1963, Nature.

[12]  Xinyu Shi,et al.  Comparison of nano-indentation hardness to microhardness , 2005 .

[13]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Deformation characteristics of zinc foam , 1975 .

[14]  M. Wolcott Cellular solids: Structure and properties , 1990 .

[15]  C. L. Magee,et al.  The Deformation of aluminum foams , 1975 .

[16]  P Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  A. Brush Tissue specific protein heterogeneity in keratin structures , 1986 .

[18]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Elastic buckling of cylindrical shells with elastic cores—II. Experiments , 1995 .

[19]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Elastic buckling of cylindrical shells with elastic cores—I. Analysis , 1995 .

[20]  J. Gillespie,et al.  The proteins of the keratin component of bird's beaks. , 1976, Australian Journal of Biological Sciences.

[21]  Julian Vincent,et al.  The mechanical properties of biological materials , 1979 .

[22]  I. Ward,et al.  The strain-rate, temperature and pressure dependence of yield of isotropic poly(methylmethacrylate) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) , 1970 .

[23]  Richard H. C. Bonser,et al.  The Young's modulus of ostrich claw keratin , 2000 .