Cells and Stripes: A novel quantitative photo-manipulation technique

Laser micro-irradiation is a technology widely used in the DNA damage response, checkpoint signaling, chromatin remodeling and related research fields, to assess chromatin modifications and recruitment of diverse DNA damage sensors, mediators and repair proteins to sites of DNA lesions. While this approach has aided numerous discoveries related to cell biology, maintenance of genome integrity, aging and cancer, it has so far been limited by a tedious manual definition of laser-irradiated subcellular regions, with the ensuing restriction to only a small number of cells treated and analyzed in a single experiment. Here, we present an improved and versatile alternative to the micro-irradiation approach: Quantitative analysis of photo-manipulated samples using innovative settings of standard laser-scanning microscopes. Up to 200 cells are simultaneously exposed to a laser beam in a defined pattern of collinear rays. The induced striation pattern is then automatically evaluated by a simple algorithm, which provides a quantitative assessment of various laser-induced phenotypes in live or fixed cells. Overall, this new approach represents a more robust alternative to existing techniques, and provides a versatile tool for a wide range of applications in biomedicine.

[1]  W. V. van Cappellen,et al.  Enhanced chromatin dynamics by FACT promotes transcriptional restart after UV-induced DNA damage. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[2]  W. V. van Cappellen,et al.  Activation of multiple DNA repair pathways by sub-nuclear damage induction methods , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[3]  Peter Bouwman,et al.  REV7 counteracts DNA double-strand break resection and affects PARP inhibition , 2015, Nature.

[4]  J. Bartek,et al.  Distinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[5]  D. Clawson,et al.  Characterization and preclinical development of LY2603618: a selective and potent Chk1 inhibitor , 2014, Investigational New Drugs.

[6]  Jared P. Stephens,et al.  Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Le Wang,et al.  The effect of caffeine on cisplatin-induced apoptosis of lung cancer cells , 2015, Experimental Hematology & Oncology.

[8]  S. Jackson,et al.  gammaH2AX and MDC1: anchoring the DNA-damage-response machinery to broken chromosomes. , 2006, DNA repair.

[9]  S. Bekker-Jensen,et al.  Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1 , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  N. Curtin,et al.  Identification and Characterization of a Novel and Specific Inhibitor of the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase ATM , 2004, Cancer Research.

[11]  S. Jackson,et al.  Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks , 2009, Nature.

[12]  J. Bartek,et al.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[13]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  Chemosensitization to cisplatin by inhibitors of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway , 2006, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[14]  G. Drummen,et al.  Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques—FRAP, FLIP, FLAP, FRET and FLIM , 2012, Molecules.

[15]  J. Murnane,et al.  Processing by MRE11 is involved in the sensitivity of subtelomeric regions to DNA double-strand breaks , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  J. Bartek,et al.  The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease , 2009, Nature.

[17]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The cellular response to DNA damage: a focus on MDC1 and its interacting proteins. , 2010, Nucleus.

[18]  M. Hande,et al.  Targeting DNA-PKcs and telomerase in brain tumour cells , 2014, Molecular Cancer.

[19]  Yan Shi,et al.  Mechanistic Dissection of PARP1 Trapping and the Impact on In Vivo Tolerability and Efficacy of PARP Inhibitors , 2015, Molecular Cancer Research.

[20]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  Regulation of DNA cross-link repair by the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. , 2012, Genes & development.

[21]  R. Splittgerber,et al.  Targeting aurora kinases limits tumour growth through DNA damage-mediated senescence and blockade of NF-κB impairs this drug-induced senescence , 2012, EMBO molecular medicine.

[22]  S. Patzke,et al.  PLK1-inhibition can cause radiosensitization or radioresistance dependent on the treatment schedule. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Mdc1 couples DNA double‐strand break recognition by Nbs1 with its H2AX‐dependent chromatin retention , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[24]  N. Mailand,et al.  ATR Prohibits Replication Catastrophe by Preventing Global Exhaustion of RPA , 2013, Cell.

[25]  P. Reaper,et al.  Selective killing of ATM- or p53-deficient cancer cells through inhibition of ATR. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[26]  B. Epe.  DNA damage spectra induced by photosensitization , 2012, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences.

[27]  Takamitsu A Kato,et al.  Comparison of the bromodeoxyuridine-mediated sensitization effects between low-LET and high-LET ionizing radiation on DNA double-strand breaks. , 2013, Oncology reports.

[28]  K. O'Byrne,et al.  Chemotherapeutic Compounds Targeting the DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways: The Good, the Bad, and the Promising , 2014, Front. Oncol..

[29]  Stéphanie Panier,et al.  Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  RNF168 Binds and Amplifies Ubiquitin Conjugates on Damaged Chromosomes to Allow Accumulation of Repair Proteins , 2009, Cell.

[32]  C. Delteil,et al.  DNA damage triggers SAF-A and RNA biogenesis factors exclusion from chromatin coupled to R-loops removal , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  J. Murnane,et al.  Processing by MRE11 is involved in the sensitivity of subtelomeric regions to DNA double-strand breaks , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  S. Jackson,et al.  Human HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-damage response to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.