Incidental environmental anchors

Three studies examined whether potential anchor values that are incidentally present in the environment can affect a person's numerical estimates. In Study 1, estimates of an athlete's performance were influenced by the number on his jersey. In Study 2, estimates of the proportion of sales in the domestic market were influenced by a product's model number. In Study 3, participants' estimates of how much they would spend at a restaurant were influenced by whether the restaurant was named “Studio 17” or “Studio 97.” These effects were not qualified by participants' expertise in the relevant domain (Study 1) or by their ability to subsequently recall the anchor value (Study 3). These findings document the existence of a new form of “basic anchoring” and suggest that not all basic anchoring effects are as fragile as the existing anchoring literature suggests. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  G. Chapman,et al.  The fragile basic anchoring effect , 2002 .

[3]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction , 1997 .

[4]  N. Epley,et al.  The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic , 2006, Psychological science.

[5]  N. Epley,et al.  Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors , 2001, Psychological science.

[6]  L. Newman,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1990 .

[7]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al.  Is 7300 m Equal to 7.3 km? Same Semantics but Different Anchoring Effects. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[8]  F. Strack,et al.  The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring tasks. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[10]  F. Strack,et al.  10 Anchoring effect , 2004 .

[11]  Dancker D.L. Daamen,et al.  Subliminal anchoring : The effects of subliminally presented numbers on probability estimates , 2006 .

[12]  J. Bargh,et al.  The Role of Consciousness in Priming Effects on Categorization , 1987 .

[13]  N. Epley,et al.  When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self‐generated and externally provided anchors , 2005 .

[14]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. , 1999 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[17]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity Decisions , 1998 .

[18]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms , 2005 .

[19]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[20]  F. Strack,et al.  The Semantics of Anchoring , 2001 .

[21]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Are Adjustments Insufficient? , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  F. Strack,et al.  Playing Dice With Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts’ Judicial Decision Making , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[23]  Nicholas Epley,et al.  A Tale of Tuned Decks? Anchoring as Accessibility and Anchoring as Adjustment , 2008 .