Learning causal dependencies to detect and diagnose faults in sensor networks

Exploiting spatial and temporal relationships in acquired datastreams is a primary ability of Cognitive Fault Detection and Diagnosis Systems (FDDSs) for sensor networks. In fact, this novel generation of FDDSs relies on the ability to correctly characterize the existing relationships among acquired datastreams to provide prompt detections of faults (while reducing false positives) and guarantee an effective isolation/identification of the sensor affected by the fault (once discriminated from a change in the environment or a model bias). The paper suggests a novel framework to automatically learn temporal and spatial relationships existing among streams of data to detect and diagnose faults. The suggested learning framework is based on a theoretically grounded hypothesis test, able to capture the Granger causal dependency existing among datastreams. Experimental results on both synthetic and real data demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed solution for fault detection.

[1]  James D. Hamilton Time Series Analysis , 1994 .

[2]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Granger Causality: Theory and Applications , 2010 .

[3]  Cesare Alippi,et al.  Fault Diagnosis Systems , 2014 .

[4]  Janos Gertler,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems , 1998 .

[5]  Huanhuan Chen,et al.  Learning in the Model Space for Cognitive Fault Diagnosis , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[6]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Cesare Alippi,et al.  A Self-Building and Cluster-Based Cognitive Fault Diagnosis System for Sensor Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[8]  T. Cipra Statistical Analysis of Time Series , 2010 .

[9]  Cesare Alippi,et al.  A Cognitive Fault Diagnosis System for Distributed Sensor Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[10]  Cesare Alippi,et al.  Intelligence for Embedded Systems , 2014 .

[11]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[12]  Seyed Mehdian,et al.  On the relationship between stock returns and exchange rates: Tests of granger causality , 1998 .

[13]  Richard E. Neapolitan,et al.  Learning Bayesian networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[14]  M. Boly,et al.  Granger Causality Analysis of Steady-State Electroencephalographic Signals during Propofol-Induced Anaesthesia , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Cesare Alippi,et al.  A high-frequency sampling monitoring system for environmental and structural applications , 2013, TOSN.

[16]  A. Seth,et al.  Multivariate Granger causality and generalized variance. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  W. Hesse,et al.  The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Manuel Roveri,et al.  An Ensemble of HMMs for Cognitive Fault Detection in Distributed Sensor Networks , 2014, AIAI.

[20]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .