A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Amy L. McGuire,et al. Genealogy databases and the future of criminal investigation , 2018, Science.
[2] M. Rothstein. GINA at Ten and the Future of Genetic Nondiscrimination Law. , 2018, The Hastings Center report.
[3] Joshua C. Denny,et al. Phenotype risk scores identify patients with unrecognized Mendelian disease patterns , 2018, Science.
[4] Alessandro Blasimme,et al. Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why? , 2017, PloS one.
[5] B. Knoppers,et al. Comparative Approaches to Genetic Discrimination: Chasing Shadows? , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[6] D. Bowen,et al. De-identified genomic data sharing: the research participant perspective , 2017, Journal of Community Genetics.
[7] M. Gabay. 21st Century Cures Act , 2017, Hospital pharmacy.
[8] N. Moray,et al. Paternity testing under the cloak of recreational genetics , 2017, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[9] Jonathan S. Schildcrout,et al. Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.
[10] M. Rothstein,et al. Compelled Disclosures of Health Records: Updated Estimates , 2017, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
[11] Xiaoqian Jiang,et al. Addressing Beacon re-identification attacks: quantification and mitigation of privacy risks , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[12] Murat Kantarcioglu,et al. Expanding Access to Large-Scale Genomic Data While Promoting Privacy: A Game Theoretic Approach. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.
[13] J. Menikoff,et al. The Common Rule, Updated. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[14] Matthew J. Bietz,et al. Privacy Attitudes among Early Adopters of Emerging Health Technologies , 2016, PloS one.
[15] Robert Cook-Deegan,et al. Beyond Our Borders? Public Resistance to Global Genomic Data Sharing , 2016, PLoS biology.
[16] S. Fullerton,et al. Genomics is failing on diversity , 2016, Nature.
[17] Diane M. Korngiebel,et al. Participants’ Role Expectations in Genetics Research and Re-consent: Revising the Theory and Methods of Mental Models Research Relating to Roles , 2016, Journal of health communication.
[18] L. Pusztai,et al. Patient preferences regarding incidental genomic findings discovered during tumor profiling , 2016, Cancer.
[19] Andelka M. Phillips,et al. ‘Only a click away — DTC genetics for ancestry, health, love…and more: A view of the business and regulatory landscape’ , 2016, Applied & translational genomics.
[20] Denise L. Perry,et al. Participants and Study Decliners’ Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing , 2016, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[21] Ine Van Hoyweghen,et al. Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review , 2016, Journal of Human Genetics.
[22] B. Clarridge,et al. Perspectives of decisional surrogates and patients regarding critical illness genetic research , 2016, AJOB Empirical Bioethics.
[23] Melissa L McPheeters,et al. A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.
[24] C. Bustamante,et al. Privacy Risks from Genomic Data-Sharing Beacons , 2015, American journal of human genetics.
[25] E. Rauscher,et al. Privacy and Family Communication about Genetic Cancer Risk: Investigating Factors Promoting Women’s Disclosure Decisions , 2015 .
[26] R. Green,et al. Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations , 2015, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
[27] E. Clayton. Why the Americans with Disabilities Act Matters for genetics. , 2015, JAMA.
[28] Kadija Ferryman,et al. Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project , 2015, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[29] J. Schisler,et al. Using Community-Based Participatory Research Principles to Develop More Understandable Recruitment and Informed Consent Documents in Genomic Research , 2015, PloS one.
[30] B. Malin,et al. Correction: A Systematic Review of Re-Identification Attacks on Health Data , 2015, PloS one.
[31] David J. Kaufman,et al. Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research. , 2015, Biopreservation and biobanking.
[32] Erick R Scott,et al. A Genome Sequencing Program for Novel Undiagnosed Diseases , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.
[33] S. Fröhling,et al. Stakeholders’ perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: systematic review of the literature , 2015, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[34] Robert C Green,et al. GINA, genetic discrimination, and genomic medicine. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.
[35] Jennifer B. McCormick,et al. Genomic Data in the Electronic Medical Record , 2014, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[36] M. Guyer,et al. The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute: reflections on an ongoing experiment. , 2014, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.
[37] K. Sim,et al. Informed consent for human genetic and genomic studies: a systematic review , 2014, Clinical genetics.
[38] E. Nwulia,et al. Genetic testing for the susceptibility to alcohol dependence: interest and concerns in an African American population. , 2014, Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers.
[39] C. Gwede,et al. Contrasting the ethical perspectives of biospecimen research among individuals with familial risk for hereditary cancer and biomedical researchers: implications for researcher training. , 2014, Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers.
[40] Jon W. McKeeby,et al. Integrating pharmacogenetic information and clinical decision support into the electronic health record , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[41] J. Schiffman,et al. Attitudes of Parents of Children with Serious Health Conditions regarding Residual Bloodspot Use , 2014, Public Health Genomics.
[42] S. Hilsenbeck,et al. Pediatric Data Sharing in Genomic Research: Attitudes and Preferences of Parents , 2014, Pediatrics.
[43] Kensaku Kawamoto,et al. Characterizing genetic variants for clinical action , 2014, American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics.
[44] Leslie G Biesecker,et al. Research participants’ attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information , 2013, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[45] Yaniv Erlich,et al. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[46] Iftikhar J. Kullo,et al. Ethical, legal, and social implications of incorporating genomic information into electronic health records , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.
[47] F. Collins,et al. Biospecimen policy: Family matters , 2013, Nature.
[48] S. B. King,et al. Community perspectives on public health biobanking: an analysis of community meetings on the Michigan BioTrust for Health , 2013, Journal of Community Genetics.
[49] Matthew M Davis,et al. Parents’ interest in whole-genome sequencing of newborns , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.
[50] Deevakar Rogith,et al. Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.
[51] Jodyn Platt,et al. Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.
[52] Amy Gutmann,et al. Found your DNA on the web: reconciling privacy and progress. , 2013, The Hastings Center report.
[53] R. Green,et al. Attitudes about regulation among direct-to-consumer genetic testing customers. , 2013, Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers.
[54] William Pao,et al. DNA-Mutation Inventory to Refine and Enhance Cancer Treatment (DIRECT): A Catalog of Clinically Relevant Cancer Mutations to Enable Genome-Directed Anticancer Therapy , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.
[55] E. Halperin,et al. Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference , 2013, Science.
[56] Eric D Green,et al. The Complexities of Genomic Identifiability , 2013, Science.
[57] Ellen Wright Clayton,et al. Parental Perspectives on a Pediatric Human Non-Subjects Biobank , 2012, AJOB primary research.
[58] J. Shendure,et al. Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: A qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms , 2012, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[59] D. Duquette,et al. Michigan BioTrust for Health: Public Support for Using Residual Dried Blood Spot Samples for Health Research , 2012, Public Health Genomics.
[60] L. Ross,et al. Biobank participation and returning research results: Perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago , 2012, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[61] D. Hegney,et al. Patients' experiences on donation of their residual biological samples and the impact of these experiences on the type of consent given for the future research use of the tissue: a systematic review. , 2012, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.
[62] Heather Skirton,et al. Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives , 2012, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[63] J. Botkin,et al. Public Attitudes Regarding the Use of Residual Newborn Screening Specimens for Research , 2012, Pediatrics.
[64] W. Burke,et al. Genetics researchers’ and IRB professionals’ attitudes toward genetic research review: a comparative analysis , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.
[65] P. A. Kelly,et al. Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Genomic Data Sharing: Genome Research Participants’ Perspectives , 2011, Public Health Genomics.
[66] Daniel R. Morrison,et al. Two large‐scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt‐out biobank , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[67] P. A. Kelly,et al. To share or not to share: A randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.
[68] Robert M. Goor,et al. Assessing and managing risk when sharing aggregate genetic variant data , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[69] D. Hegney,et al. Patients' experiences towards the donation of their residual biological samples and the impact of these experiences on the type of consent given for secondary use: A systematic review. , 2011, JBI library of systematic reviews.
[70] J. Nurnberger,et al. Ethnic disparities in the perception of ethical risks from psychiatric genetic studies , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.
[71] A. Lemke,et al. Attitudes toward Genetic Research Review: Results from a Survey of Human Genetics Researchers , 2011, Public Health Genomics.
[72] B. Wilfond,et al. Patient Perspectives on Group Benefits and Harms in Genetic Research , 2010, Public Health Genomics.
[73] K. Weinfurt,et al. Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: Stakeholder perspectives , 2010, Genetics in Medicine.
[74] L. Ciaccia,et al. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks , 2010, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.
[75] S. Fullerton,et al. Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants , 2010, Genetics in Medicine.
[76] Michelle M Mello,et al. The Havasupai Indian tribe case--lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[77] A. Lemke,et al. Attitudes toward Genetic Research Review: Results from a National Survey of Professionals Involved in Human Subjects Protection , 2010, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[78] Wendy A. Wolf,et al. Public and Biobank Participant Attitudes toward Genetic Research Participation and Data Sharing , 2010, Public Health Genomics.
[79] K. Goddard,et al. Biobank Recruitment: Motivations for Nonparticipation. , 2009, Biopreservation and biobanking.
[80] L. Dressler,et al. How Will GINA Influence Participation in Pharmacogenomics Research and Clinical Testing? , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.
[81] B. Wilfond,et al. Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. , 2009, The Journal of pediatrics.
[82] Jessica Roberts. Preempting Discrimination: Lessons from the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act , 2009 .
[83] Joan Scott,et al. Veterans' attitudes regarding a database for genomic research , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.
[84] Wendy A. Wolf,et al. Assessing the understanding of biobank participants , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[85] A. McGuire. Identifiability of DNA Data: The Need for Consistent Federal Policy , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[86] Sara Chandros Hull,et al. Patients' Views on Identifiability of Samples and Informed Consent for Genetic Research , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[87] S. Nelson,et al. Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping Microarrays , 2008, PLoS genetics.
[88] Amy L McGuire,et al. Confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic and genomic test information in electronic health records: points to consider , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.
[89] C. Skinner,et al. Factors Associated with African Americans’ Enrollment in a National Cancer Genetics Registry , 2008, Public Health Genomics.
[90] J. Wyatt,et al. US and Scottish Health Professionals attitudes toward DNA biobanking. , 2007, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.
[91] V. Champion,et al. Cancer Patients' Attitudes toward Future Research Uses of Stored Human Biological Materials , 2007, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[92] Daniel J. Solove,et al. ダニエル・J・ソロブ「プライバシーの分類」--Daniel J. Solove, A Taxonomy of Privacy 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 477 (2006) , 2006 .
[93] Karen M Kaphingst,et al. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research , 2006, Clinical genetics.
[94] C. Coopersmith,et al. Genetic research and testing in critical care: Surrogates’ perspective* , 2006, Critical care medicine.
[95] Zhen Lin,et al. Genomic Research and Human Subject Privacy , 2004, Science.
[96] H. Valdimarsdottir,et al. Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.
[97] Jennifer L. Bevan,et al. Informed lay preferences for delivery of racially varied pharmacogenomics , 2003, Genetics in Medicine.
[98] M. Rothstein,et al. Public Attitudes about Pharmacogenomics , 2003 .
[99] Celeste M. Condit,et al. How the public understands genetics: non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the “blueprint” metaphor , 1999 .
[100] D. Wertz. The Difficulties of Recruiting Minorities to Studies of Ethics and Values in Genetics , 1999, Public Health Genomics.
[101] J. E. Nash,et al. Privacy and confidentiality in the publication of pedigrees: a survey of investigators and biomedical journals. , 1998, JAMA.
[102] Robert Kevin Grigsby,et al. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects , 1993, Research on social work practice.
[103] Louis D. Brandeis,et al. The Right to Privacy , 1890 .
[104] “Common Rule,et al. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule. , 2017, Federal register.
[105] Christopher G Chute,et al. Preemptive genotyping for personalized medicine: design of the right drug, right dose, right time-using genomic data to individualize treatment protocol. , 2014, Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[106] David McHugh,et al. Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics , 2011 .
[107] A. McGuire,et al. DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.
[108] Daniel J. Solove,et al. A Taxonomy of Privacy , 2006 .
[109] Jennifer L. Bevan,et al. Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research. , 2005, Social science & medicine.
[110] J. Ingram,et al. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on , 2003 .
[111] Gail Geller,et al. Mapping the human genome: An assessment of media coverage and public reaction , 2002, Genetics in Medicine.
[112] A Heinrichs,et al. PubMed Central. , 2001, Trends in molecular medicine.