Design of passive directional acoustic devices using Topology Optimization - from method to experimental validation.

The paper presents a topology optimization based method for designing acoustic focusing devices, capable of tailoring the sound emission pattern of one or several sources, across a chosen frequency band. The method is demonstrated numerically considering devices optimized for directional sound emission in two dimensions and is experimentally validated using three dimensional prints of the optimized designs. The emitted fields exhibit a level difference of at least 15 dB on axis relative to the off-axis directions, over frequency bands of approximately an octave. It is demonstrated to be possible to design focusing devices of dimensions comparable to the acoustic wavelength, a frequency range which is typically problematic, as well as devices operating at higher frequencies. The classical parabolic reflector is used as a benchmark. The devices designed using the proposed method are shown to outperform the latter in terms of directivity and maximum side-lobe level over nearly an octave band. A set of frequencies are considered simultaneously in the design formulation and performance robustness toward uniform spatial production errors in the designed devices is assured by including perturbations of the geometry in the design formulation.

[1]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Creating geometrically robust designs for highly sensitive problems using topology optimization , 2015 .

[2]  Jakob S. Jensen,et al.  Acoustic design by topology optimization , 2008 .

[3]  T. E. Bruns,et al.  Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[4]  James K. Guest,et al.  Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions , 2004 .

[5]  Arthur P. Berkhoff,et al.  Directional loudspeaker arrays for acoustic warning systems with minimised noise pollution , 2015 .

[6]  Krister Svanberg,et al.  A Class of Globally Convergent Optimization Methods Based on Conservative Convex Separable Approximations , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[7]  Mark S. Ureda Analysis of Loudspeaker Line Arrays , 2004 .

[8]  R. S. Little,et al.  ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF PARABOLIC REFLECTORS , 1966 .

[9]  Wim Desmet,et al.  A Coupled Finite Element–Wave Based Approach for the Steady-State Dynamic Analysis of Acoustic Systems , 2001 .

[10]  E. Wadbro,et al.  Topology optimization of an acoustic horn , 2006 .

[11]  Martin Berggren,et al.  Optimization of an acoustic horn with respect to efficiency and directivity , 2008 .

[12]  Sten Wahlström The Parabolic Reflector as an Acoustical Amplifier , 1985 .

[13]  Shengli Xu,et al.  Volume preserving nonlinear density filter based on heaviside functions , 2010 .

[14]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  Minimization of sound radiation from vibrating bi-material structures using topology optimization , 2007 .

[15]  B. Bourdin Filters in topology optimization , 2001 .

[16]  T. F. Hueter Twenty Years in Underwater Acoustics: Generation and Reception , 1972 .

[17]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization , 2011, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[18]  F. Jacobsen,et al.  Sound field control with a circular double-layer array of loudspeakers. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Junghwan Kook,et al.  Acoustical topology optimization for Zwicker’s loudness model – Application to noise barriers , 2012 .

[20]  Martin Berggren,et al.  Shape optimization of an acoustic horn , 2003 .

[21]  D. Tortorelli,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis: Overview and review , 1994 .

[22]  Finn Jacobsen,et al.  Experimental validation of sound field control with a circular double-layer array of loudspeakers. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Experimental validation of a topology optimized acoustic cavity. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[25]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Robust topology optimization accounting for spatially varying manufacturing errors , 2011 .