Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding

The purpose in this study was to distinguish among possible mechanisms by which focused attention facilitates visual perceptual processing in a cued discrimination task. In two experiments, subjects verified the presence of an X in masked, briefly presented, four-letter arrays. On most trials, subjects were precued to the location of the stimulus array (valid-cue condition); however, sometimes a nonstimulus location was cued (invalid-cue condition). The exposure duration of the stimulus array was varied. In Experiment 1, there was a large effect of cue condition on hit probability, but no effect of cue condition on false alarm probability. In Experiment 2, there was a large effect of cue condition ond′. In both experiments, the stimulus duration needed to reach any given performance level was greater by a constant factor for stimuli in the invalid-cue than it was in the valid-cue condition. This suggests that visual information is acquired (or utilized) more rapidly from attended than from unattended locations.

[1]  W. Stiles.  The Directional Sensitivity of the Retina and the Spectral Sensitivities of the Rods and Cones , 1939 .

[2]  G. Humphreys.  Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[4]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[5]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R. Remington,et al.  Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  G R Loftus,et al.  How much is an icon worth? , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  C. J. Downing.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  G. Loftus.  Picture perception: effects of luminance on available information and information-extraction rate. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  H. Egeth,et al.  Does the identification of simple features require serial processing , 1989 .

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  E. Wright,et al.  Effects of semantic priming on visual encoding of pictures. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  A. V. D. Heijden,et al.  Single-letter recognition accuracy benefits from advance cuing of location , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  P Kramer,et al.  Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  G. Loftus.  On interpretation of interactions , 1978 .

[20]  G. Shulman,et al.  Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Jonides.  Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[22]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  M. Posner,et al.  Does attention affect visual feature integration? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Y. Tsal.  Movements of attention across the visual field , 1983 .

[26]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.