Impact of primary health care reforms in Quebec Health Care System: a systematic literature review protocol

Introduction During the last decade the Quebec Public Health Care System (QPHCS) had an important transformation in primary care planning activity. The increase of the service demand together with a significant reduction of supply in primary care may be at risk of reducing access to health care services, with a negative impact on costs and health outcomes. The aims of this systematic literature review are to map and aggregate existing literature and evidence on the primary care provided in Quebec, showing the benefits and limitations associated with the health policies developed in the last two decades, and highlighting areas of improvement. Methods and analysis PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL will be searched for articles and government reports between January 2000 and January 2022 using a prespecified search strategy. This protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Protocols and has been registered with PROSPERO. A wide range of electronic databases and grey literature sources will be systematically searched using predefined keywords. The review will include any study design, with the exclusion of protocols, with a focus on the analysis of health care policies, outcomes, costs and management of the primary health care services, published in either English or French languages. Two authors will independently screen titles, abstracts, full-text articles and select studies meeting the inclusion criteria. A customised data extraction form will be used to extract data from the included studies. Results will be presented in tabular format developed iteratively by the research team. Ethics and dissemination Research ethics approval is not required as exclusively secondary data will be used. Review findings will synthesise the characteristics and the impact of the reforms of QPHCS of the last two decades. Findings will therefore be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and through discussions with stakeholders. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023421145.

[1]  M. Mathews,et al.  COVID-19 – an opportunity to improve access to primary care through organizational innovations? A qualitative multiple case study in Quebec and Nova Scotia (Canada) , 2021, BMC Health Services Research.

[2]  G. Luscombe,et al.  The relationship between having a regular general practitioner (GP) and the experience of healthcare barriers: a cross-sectional study among young people in NSW, Australia, with oversampling from marginalised groups , 2020, BMC Family Practice.

[3]  A. Quesnel-Vallée,et al.  Improving Access to Family Medicine in Quebec through Quotas and Numerical Targets , 2019, Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé.

[4]  O. Pasche,et al.  Importance of the GP–patient relationship , 2019, European Journal of General Practice.

[5]  P. Van Royen,et al.  Information campaigns and trained triagists may support patients in making an appropriate choice between GP and emergency department , 2019, The European journal of general practice.

[6]  Myriam Gaudreault,et al.  Promoting access to family medicine in Québec, Canada: Analysis of bill 20, enacted in November 2015. , 2019, Health policy.

[7]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews , 2019 .

[8]  O. Pasche,et al.  Deciding whether to consult the GP or an emergency department: A qualitative study of patient reasoning in Switzerland , 2019, The European journal of general practice.

[9]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) , 2018, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[10]  Kate Sidaway-Lee,et al.  Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality , 2018, BMJ Open.

[11]  C. van Weel,et al.  Why strengthening primary health care is essential to achieving universal health coverage , 2018, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[12]  M. Vainieri,et al.  Patient-perceived responsiveness of primary care systems across Europe and the relationship with the health expenditure and remuneration systems of primary care doctors. , 2017, Social science & medicine.

[13]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[14]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  T. Dorner,et al.  Access points to the different levels of health care and demographic predictors in a country without a gatekeeping system. Results of a cross-sectional study from Austria. , 2013, European journal of public health.

[16]  Jason W Busse,et al.  What is your research question? An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians. , 2012, The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association.

[17]  Raynald Pineault,et al.  L'implantation du modèle des groupes de médecine de famille au Québec : potentiel et limites pour l'accroissement de la performance des soins de santé primaires , 2011 .

[18]  E. Adashi,et al.  Health care reform and primary care--the growing importance of the community health center. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  William Hogg,et al.  Organismes intégrés de soins primaires: La prochaine étape de la réforme des soins primaires , 2010 .

[20]  Kurt C Stange,et al.  The Paradox of Primary Care , 2009, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[21]  Denise O'Connor,et al.  Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies , 2008 .

[22]  François-Pierre Gladu,et al.  Perceived shortage of family doctors in Quebec: can we do something about it? , 2007, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[23]  B. Starfield,et al.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[24]  James Macinko,et al.  The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, 1970-1998. , 2003, Health services research.

[25]  P. R. Alper.  Improving access to primary care. , 1993, JAMA.

[26]  M. Roland,et al.  The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients. , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.