Evolutionary role of restriction/modification systems as revealed by comparative genome analysis.

Type II restriction modification systems (RMSs) have been regarded either as defense tools or as molecular parasites of bacteria. We extensively analyzed their evolutionary role from the study of their impact in the complete genomes of 26 bacteria and 35 phages in terms of palindrome avoidance. This analysis reveals that palindrome avoidance is not universally spread among bacterial species and that it does not correlate with taxonomic proximity. Palindrome avoidance is also not universal among bacteriophage, even when their hosts code for RMSs, and depends strongly on the genetic material of the phage. Interestingly, palindrome avoidance is intimately correlated with the infective behavior of the phage. We observe that the degree of palindrome and restriction site avoidance is significantly and consistently less important in phages than in their bacterial hosts. This result brings to the fore a larger selective load for palindrome and restriction site avoidance on the bacterial hosts than on their infecting phages. It is then consistent with a view where type II RMSs are considered as parasites possibly at the verge of mutualism. As a consequence, RMSs constitute a nontrivial third player in the host-parasite relationship between bacteria and phages.

[1]  P. Tiollais,et al.  Bacteriophage λ Having EcoRI Endonuclease Sites Only in the Nonessential Region of the Genome , 1974 .

[2]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[3]  M. Doebeli,et al.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  T. Bickle,et al.  Bacteriophage survival: multiple mechanisms for avoiding the deoxyribonucleic acid restriction systems of their hosts. , 1983, Microbiological reviews.

[5]  S Karlin,et al.  Similarities and dissimilarities of phage genomes. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  S. Halford,et al.  DNA restriction dependent on two recognition sites: activities of the Sfi I restriction–modification system in Escherichia coli , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[7]  Lucy Shapiro,et al.  Bacterial DNA Methylation: a Cell Cycle Regulator? , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  John M. Logsdon,et al.  Archaeal genomics: Do archaea have a mixed heritage? , 1998, Current Biology.

[9]  F. M. Stewart,et al.  The population biology of bacterial viruses: why be temperate. , 1984, Theoretical Population Biology.

[10]  G. Sarkis,et al.  Genome structure of mycobacteriophage D29: implications for phage evolution. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  K Kusano,et al.  Selfish behavior of restriction-modification systems , 1995, Science.

[12]  A Danchin,et al.  Oligonucleotide bias in Bacillus subtilis: general trends and taxonomic comparisons. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  E. Koonin,et al.  Computer analysis of transcription regulatory patterns in completely sequenced bacterial genomes. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  E V Koonin,et al.  Avoidance of palindromic words in bacterial and archaeal genomes: a close connection with restriction enzymes. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  E. Sober,et al.  Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences , 1994 .

[16]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  Over- and Underrepresentation of Short DNA Words in Herpesvirus Genomes , 1996, J. Comput. Biol..

[17]  S Karlin,et al.  Computational DNA sequence analysis. , 1994, Annual review of microbiology.

[18]  C. Woese.  The universal ancestor. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Lauster.  Evolution of type II DNA methyltransferases. A gene duplication model. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  B. Levin,et al.  Sensitivity of naturally occurring coliphages to type I and type II restriction and modification. , 1993, Journal of general microbiology.

[21]  Benjamin L. King,et al.  Genomic-sequence comparison of two unrelated isolates of the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori , 1999, Nature.

[22]  K. Okamoto,et al.  Evidence of Horizontal Transfer of theEcoO109I Restriction-Modification Gene to Escherichia coli Chromosomal DNA , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  B. Levin.  The accessory genetic elements of bacteria: existence conditions and (co)evolution. , 1993, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[24]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution , 1980, Nature.

[25]  T. Lindahl.  Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA , 1993, Nature.

[26]  S Karlin,et al.  Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  Ichizo Kobayashi,et al.  Cellular Responses to Postsegregational Killing by Restriction-Modification Genes , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  T. Bickle,et al.  Bacteriophage survival: multiple mechanisms for avoiding the deoxyribonucleic acid restriction systems of their hosts , 1983 .

[29]  K. Marians.  Prokaryotic DNA replication. , 1992, Annual review of biochemistry.

[30]  B. Barrell,et al.  Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence , 1998, Nature.

[31]  R. Hendrix,et al.  Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: all the world's a phage. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  W. Arber.  HOST SPECIFICITY OF DNA PRODUCED BY ESCHERICHIA COLI V . THE ROLE OF METHIONINE IN THE PRODUCTION OF HOST SPECIFICITY. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  R J Roberts,et al.  REBASE ? restriction enzymes and methylases , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  G. Wilson.  Organization of restriction-modification systems. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  I Uchiyama,et al.  Shaping the genome--restriction-modification systems as mobile genetic elements. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[36]  I. Kobayashi,et al.  Restriction-modification systems as genomic parasites in competition for specific sequences. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Sophie Schbath,et al.  An Efficient Statistic to Detect Over-and Under-Represented Words in DNA Sequences , 1997, J. Comput. Biol..

[38]  S. Gould,et al.  Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection: how shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Sophie Schbath,et al.  Exceptional Motifs in Different Markov Chain Models for a Statistical Analysis of DNA Sequences , 1995, J. Comput. Biol..

[40]  S. Ehrlich,et al.  DNA restriction-modification systems mediate plasmid maintenance , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  N. Murray,et al.  The diversity of alleles at the hsd locus in natural populations of Escherichia coli. , 1995, Genetics.

[42]  P. Sharp.  Molecular evolution of bacteriophages: evidence of selection against the recognition sites of host restriction enzymes. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[43]  S. Karlin,et al.  Over- and under-representation of short oligonucleotides in DNA sequences. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  K. J. Fullner,et al.  Mycobacteriophage L5 infection of Mycobacterium bovis BCG: implications for phage genetics in the slow‐growing mycobacteria , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[45]  S Karlin,et al.  Statistical analyses of counts and distributions of restriction sites in DNA sequences. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[46]  B. Levin,et al.  PHAGE‐MEDIATED SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION AND MAINTENANCE OF RESTRICTION‐MODIFICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  J. Lake,et al.  Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  M. O'Neill,et al.  The restriction-modification genes of Escherichia coli K-12 may not be selfish: they do not resist loss and are readily replaced by alleles conferring different specificities. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  A. Danchin,et al.  Uneven distribution of GATC motifs in the Escherichia coli chromosome, its plasmids and its phages. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  K. Dybvig,et al.  The hsd loci of Mycoplasma pulmonis: organization, rearrangements and expression of genes , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[51]  U. Mueller,et al.  The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  A Danchin,et al.  Analysis of long repeats in bacterial genomes reveals alternative evolutionary mechanisms in Bacillus subtilis and other competent prokaryotes. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.