Routing in vehicular network is a major challenge and research area. The major threat is the node density and high dynamics of the network topology. Existing position based routing protocols try to solve this by forwarding data in greedy forwarding way. However, they solely depend upon Location services. Location service makes a lot of transactions in the network traffic. Proactive routing protocols find the destination information by flooding RREQ messages. But flooding also increases routing overhead. Again they maintain a route from source to destination. The lifetime of route is same as the life time of the edge with smallest life time. This makes it vulnerable to path break up, which leads to frequent RREQ flooding. We have tried to solve the above stated problems in three manners: (1) Location service overhead problem: We have not used any location server; rather a destination discovery message is sent from source to destination which finds the destination direction relative to source. If the destination direction is known this is not used. (2) Flooding of RREQ problem: We have not used any flooding. We have used only unicast messages. (3) Path break-up problem: We have not used any dedicated path from source to destination for data transmission. Rather we have selected the next hop in the direction of destination to send a packet using an algorithm called smart next hop selection algorithm (SNESA). Also we have tried to reduce the frequency of HELLO messages using neighbor update algorithm which validates the neighborhood of a node.
[1]
Christian F. Tschudin,et al.
The gray zone problem in IEEE 802.11b based ad hoc networks
,
2002,
MOCO.
[2]
Brad Karp,et al.
GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks
,
2000,
MobiCom '00.
[3]
David B. Johnson,et al.
The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
,
2003
.
[4]
Jörg Widmer,et al.
Hierarchical location service for mobile ad-hoc networks
,
2004,
MOCO.
[5]
Martin Mauve,et al.
A survey on position-based routing in mobile ad hoc networks
,
2001,
IEEE Netw..
[6]
Hao Zhu,et al.
MURU: A Multi-Hop Routing Protocol for Urban Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks
,
2006,
2006 Third Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services.
[7]
Azim Eskandarian,et al.
Challenges of intervehicle ad hoc networks
,
2004,
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[8]
Charles E. Perkins,et al.
Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing
,
2001,
RFC.
[9]
Hamid Menouar,et al.
A movement prediction-based routing protocol for vehicle-to-vehicle communications
,
2005
.
[10]
Ehssan Sakhaee,et al.
A Stable Routing Protocol to Support ITS Services in VANET Networks
,
2007,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.
[11]
Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.
The Broadcast Storm Problem in a Mobile Ad Hoc Network
,
1999,
Wirel. Networks.