Characterization of a Set of ECN Spray A Injectors: Nozzle to Nozzle Variations and Effect on Spray Characteristics

The Engine Combustion Network (ECN) is becoming a leading group concerning the experimental and computational analysis of Engine combustion. In order to establish a coherent database for model validation, all the institutions participating to the experimental effort carry out experiments at well-defined standard conditions (in particular at Spray A conditions: 22.8kg/m3, 900K, 0% and 15% O2) and with Diesel injectors having the same specifications. Due to the rising number of ECN participants and also to unavoidable damages, additional injectors are required. This raises the question of injector's characteristics reproducibility and of the appropriate method to introduce such new injectors in the ECN network. In order to investigate this issue, a set of 8 new injectors with identical nominal Spray A specification were purchased and 4 of them were characterized using ECN standard diagnostics. In particular, the measurements include the nozzle hole diameter, the rate of injection, the liquid and vapor penetrations, the auto-ignition delay and the lift-off length. Variations of ambient temperature, oxygen concentration and density have also been performed. In general the results show similar behavior to ECN standard injectors, confirming that this set of new injectors can be integrated into the pool of ECN injectors. However, discrepancies between spray characteristics were observed, although the injector specifications and the boundary conditions were sensibly the same. The sources of variations from injector to injector are analyzed in order to provide new information on the reproducibility of injectors characteristics, and improve the comparison methodology between experimental data and simulation.

[1]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Relationship Between Diesel Fuel Spray Vapor Penetration/Dispersion and Local Fuel Mixture Fraction , 2011 .

[2]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Scaling Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays Based on Mixing-Limited Vaporization , 1999 .

[3]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Measurement of the Flame Lift-Off Location on DI Diesel Sprays Using OH Chemiluminescence , 2001 .

[4]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  ENGINE COMBUSTION NETWORK (ECN): MEASUREMENTS OF NOZZLE GEOMETRY AND HYDRAULIC BEHAVIOR , 2012 .

[5]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays , 1998 .

[6]  Lyle M. Pickett,et al.  Study of Soot Formation and Oxidation in the Engine Combustion Network (ECN), Spray A: Effects of Ambient Temperature and Oxygen Concentration , 2013 .

[7]  Thierry Baritaud,et al.  Macroscopic and Ignition Characteristics of High-Pressure Sprays of Single-Component Fuels , 1998 .

[8]  A. G. Gaydon The spectroscopy of flames , 1957 .

[9]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Relationship Between Ignition Processes and the Lift-Off Length of Diesel Fuel Jets , 2005 .

[10]  J. Naber,et al.  Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays , 1996 .

[11]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Fuel Jets: Oxygen Concentration Effects , 2002 .

[12]  Raul Payri,et al.  ENGINE COMBUSTION NETWORK: COMPARISON OF SPRAY DEVELOPMENT, VAPORIZATION, AND COMBUSTION IN DIFFERENT COMBUSTION VESSELS , 2012 .

[13]  Raul Payri,et al.  Engine combustion network (ECN): characterization and comparison of boundary conditions for different combustion vessels , 2012 .

[14]  L. Pickett,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty of Liquid Penetration in Evaporating Diesel Sprays , 2011 .

[15]  Caroline L. Genzale,et al.  Comparison of Diesel Spray Combustion in Different High-Temperature, High-Pressure Facilities , 2010 .

[16]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Sprays Under Quiescent Conditions , 2001 .