Optimization of preparation conditions for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/ceramic composite pervaporation membranes using response surface methodology

Abstract We used response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize the preparation conditions that had great effects on the performance of the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/ceramic composite membranes for pervaporation. Good performance of membranes could be realized through manipulating three variables, which were polymer concentration, crosslink agent concentration, dip-coating time. In our study, we established the regression equations between the preparation variables and the performance of the composite membranes. We investigated main effects, quadratic effects and interactions of the three variables on the flux and the selectivity of composite membranes. The results showed that polymer concentration was the most significant variable that influenced the permeation flux and the selectivity among three variables and the experimental results were in good agreement with those predicted by the proposed regression models. At a feed temperature of 333 K under a pressure of 500 Pa in an ethanol concentration of 4.2 wt.%, the maximum flux of the 12.95 kg m −2  h −1 was obtained by employing the model under the following preparation conditions: polymer concentration 7.4 wt.%, crosslink agent concentration 10.6 wt.%, dip-coating time 60 s. One can expect to apply the regression equations in the preparation of PDMS/ceramic membranes and reasonably predict and optimize the performance of the composite membranes.

[1]  A. Ribes‐Greus,et al.  Characterization of poly(dimethylsiloxane)‐poly(methyl hydrogen siloxane) composite membranes for organic water pervaporation separation , 2001 .

[2]  Klaus Hinkelmann,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiment , 1975 .

[3]  Ken-ichi Okamoto,et al.  Pervaporation of Water-Ethanol Mixtures through Poly-dimethylsiloxane Block-Copolymer Membranes , 1987 .

[4]  K. Yamagiwa,et al.  Temperature-sensitive ethanol permselectivity of poly(dimethylsiloxane) membrane by the modification of its surface with , 1993 .

[5]  L. Reijnders Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use , 2006 .

[6]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[7]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[8]  T. Miyata,et al.  Control of permselectivity with surface modifications of poly[1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] membranes , 1999 .

[9]  James D. McMillan,et al.  Effects of synthesis conditions on the pervaporation properties of poly[1‐(trimethylsilyl)‐1‐propyne] useful for membrane bioreactors , 2004 .

[10]  Leland M. Vane,et al.  A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes , 2005 .

[11]  T. Nakane,et al.  Improvement of ethanol selectivity of silicalite membrane in pervaporation by silicone rubber coating , 2002 .

[12]  Tang Bin,et al.  Selective ethanol extraction from fermentation broth using a silicalite membrane , 2002 .

[13]  Ivo F. J. Vankelecom,et al.  INFLUENCE OF ZEOLITES IN PDMS MEMBRANES - PERVAPORATION OF WATER/ALCOHOL MIXTURES , 1995 .

[14]  Hideki Yamada,et al.  Pervaporation of ethanol/water mixtures using novel hydrophobic membranes containing polydimethylsiloxane , 1992 .

[15]  Kazuhiro Okabe,et al.  Separation of ethanol from ethanol/water mixtures by plasma-polymerized membranes from silicone compounds , 1988 .

[16]  Wanqin Jin,et al.  Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/Ceramic Composite Membrane with High Flux for Pervaporation of Ethanol−Water Mixtures , 2007 .

[17]  K. Ishihara,et al.  Chemical modification of poly(substituted‐acetylene): II. Pervaporation of ethanol / water mixture through poly(1‐trimethylsilyl‐1‐propyne) / poly(dimethylsiloxane) graft copolymer membrane , 1990 .

[18]  Ahmad Fauzi Ismail,et al.  Development of defect-free asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation using response surface methodology , 2004 .

[19]  J. A. González-Marcos,et al.  Pervaporation of ethanol—water mixtures through poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) (PTMSP) membranes☆ , 2002 .

[20]  I. Pinnau,et al.  Gas-permeation properties of asymmetric polycarbonate, polyestercarbonate, and fluorinated polyimide membranes prepared by the generalized dry-wet phase inversion process , 1992 .

[21]  Y. Idemoto,et al.  Stabilization of bioethanol recovery with silicone rubber‐coated ethanol‐permselective silicalite membranes by controlling the pH of acidic feed solution , 2005 .

[22]  Y. Cohen,et al.  A Novel Ceramic-Supported Polymer Membrane for Pervaporation of Dilute Volatile Organic Compounds , 1999 .

[23]  Y. Kang,et al.  Composite membranes of poly(1‐trimethylsilyl‐1‐propyne) and poly(dimethyl siloxane) and their pervaporation properties for ethanol–water mixture , 1994 .

[24]  Mohd Yusof Noordin,et al.  Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of thin film composite membrane , 2006 .

[25]  Eli Ruckenstein,et al.  Pervaporation of ethanol-water mixtures through polydimethylsiloxane-polystyrene interpenetrating polymer network supported membranes , 1996 .

[26]  Xiangshu Chen,et al.  Synthesis of silicalite tubular membranes by in situ crystallization , 2003 .